These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32000525)

  • 1. An evaluation of glistening and stability of intraocular lens material manufactured by different methods.
    Kawai K
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 31(2):427-435. PubMed ID: 32000525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-vitro glistening formation in six different foldable hydrophobic intraocular lenses.
    Tandogan T; Auffarth GU; Son HS; Merz P; Choi CY; Khoramnia R
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):126. PubMed ID: 33685428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of microvacuole formation in five intraocular lens models made of different hydrophobic materials.
    Yildirim TM; Schickhardt SK; Wang Q; Friedmann E; Khoramnia R; Auffarth GU
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250860. PubMed ID: 33930084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective classification of glistenings in implanted intraocular lenses using Scheimpflug tomography.
    Biwer H; Schuber E; Honig M; Spratte B; Baumeister M; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Dec; 41(12):2644-51. PubMed ID: 26796445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and material degradations of intraocular lenses: A review.
    Stanojcic N; Hull C; O'Brart DP
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Sep; 30(5):823-839. PubMed ID: 31387387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence of glistenings with the latest generation of yellow-tinted hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Colin J; Praud D; Touboul D; Schweitzer C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1140-6. PubMed ID: 22727284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and experimental observation of glistening in acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Miyata A; Uchida N; Nakajima K; Yaguchi S
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2001; 45(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 11754896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glistenings on intraocular lenses in healthy eyes: effects and associations.
    Colin J; Orignac I
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 27(12):869-75. PubMed ID: 21800784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of in vitro accelerated glistening formation in foldable hydrophobic intraocular lenses.
    Tandogan T; Auffarth GU; Choi CY; Son HS; Khoramnia R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 41(9):3073-3080. PubMed ID: 34013467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glistenings, anterior/posterior capsular opacification and incidence of Nd:YAG laser treatments with two aspheric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses - a long-term intra-individual study.
    Johansson B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 95(7):671-677. PubMed ID: 28371401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glistenings in foldable intraocular lenses.
    Tognetto D; Toto L; Sanguinetti G; Ravalico G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1211-6. PubMed ID: 12106730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-Term Changes in Prediction Error after Cataract Surgery in Eyes Receiving 1 of 3 Types of Single-Piece Acrylic Intraocular Lenses.
    Hayashi K; Yoshida M; Hayashi S; Yoshimura K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 219():12-20. PubMed ID: 32479807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glistenings with long-term follow-up of the Surgidev B20/20 polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens.
    Wilkins E; Olson RJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Nov; 132(5):783-5. PubMed ID: 11704044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of in vitro glistening formation in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Thomes BE; Callaghan TA
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2013; 7():1529-34. PubMed ID: 23926419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of clarity characteristics in a new hydrophobic acrylic IOL in comparison to commercially available IOLs.
    Werner L; Thatthamla I; Ong M; Schatz H; Garcia-Gonzalez M; Gros-Otero J; Cañones-Zafra R; Teus MA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1490-1497. PubMed ID: 31399323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Postoperative Stability of Intraocular Lenses after Phacovitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.
    Akiyama A; Yokota H; Aso H; Hanazaki H; Iwasaki M; Yamagami S; Nagaoka T
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jun; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 35743508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glistenings 9 years after phacoemulsification in hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Chang A; Kugelberg M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jun; 41(6):1199-204. PubMed ID: 26100954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior capsule opacification with the iMics1 NY-60 and AcrySof SN60WF 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses: 3-year results of a randomized trial.
    Leydolt C; Schriefl S; Stifter E; Haszcz A; Menapace R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 156(2):375-381.e2. PubMed ID: 23677137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of glistenings in intraocular lenses with three different materials: 12-year follow-up.
    Rønbeck M; Behndig A; Taube M; Koivula A; Kugelberg M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 22035345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glistening Formation and Light Scattering in Six Hydrophobic-Acrylic Intraocular Lenses.
    Łabuz G; Knebel D; Auffarth GU; Fang H; van den Berg TJ; Yildirim TM; Son HS; Khoramnia R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 196():112-120. PubMed ID: 30189220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.