358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32000688)
1. The effects of common structural variants on 3D chromatin structure.
Shanta O; Noor A; ; Sebat J
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):95. PubMed ID: 32000688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional genome landscape comprehensively reveals patterns of spatial gene regulation in papillary and anaplastic thyroid cancers: a study using representative cell lines for each cancer type.
Zhang L; Xu M; Zhang W; Zhu C; Cui Z; Fu H; Ma Y; Huang S; Cui J; Liang S; Huang L; Wang H
Cell Mol Biol Lett; 2023 Jan; 28(1):1. PubMed ID: 36609218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D genome evolution and reorganization in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.
Torosin NS; Anand A; Golla TR; Cao W; Ellison CE
PLoS Genet; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1009229. PubMed ID: 33284803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large scale genomic reorganization of topological domains at the HoxD locus.
Fabre PJ; Leleu M; Mormann BH; Lopez-Delisle L; Noordermeer D; Beccari L; Duboule D
Genome Biol; 2017 Aug; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 28784160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Topologically associating domains and their role in the evolution of genome structure and function in
Liao Y; Zhang X; Chakraborty M; Emerson JJ
Genome Res; 2021 Mar; 31(3):397-410. PubMed ID: 33563719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disruption of topologically associating domains by structural variations in tetraploid cottons.
Long Y; Liu Z; Wang P; Yang H; Wang Y; Zhang S; Zhang X; Wang M
Genomics; 2021 Sep; 113(5):3405-3414. PubMed ID: 34311045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hi-C Identifies Complex Genomic Rearrangements and TAD-Shuffling in Developmental Diseases.
Melo US; Schöpflin R; Acuna-Hidalgo R; Mensah MA; Fischer-Zirnsak B; Holtgrewe M; Klever MK; Türkmen S; Heinrich V; Pluym ID; Matoso E; Bernardo de Sousa S; Louro P; Hülsemann W; Cohen M; Dufke A; Latos-Bieleńska A; Vingron M; Kalscheuer V; Quintero-Rivera F; Spielmann M; Mundlos S
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Jun; 106(6):872-884. PubMed ID: 32470376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structural variants drive context-dependent oncogene activation in cancer.
Xu Z; Lee DS; Chandran S; Le VT; Bump R; Yasis J; Dallarda S; Marcotte S; Clock B; Haghani N; Cho CY; Akdemir KC; Tyndale S; Futreal PA; McVicker G; Wahl GM; Dixon JR
Nature; 2022 Dec; 612(7940):564-572. PubMed ID: 36477537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polymer physics predicts the effects of structural variants on chromatin architecture.
Bianco S; Lupiáñez DG; Chiariello AM; Annunziatella C; Kraft K; Schöpflin R; Wittler L; Andrey G; Vingron M; Pombo A; Mundlos S; Nicodemi M
Nat Genet; 2018 May; 50(5):662-667. PubMed ID: 29662163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 5C analysis of the Epidermal Differentiation Complex locus reveals distinct chromatin interaction networks between gene-rich and gene-poor TADs in skin epithelial cells.
Poterlowicz K; Yarker JL; Malashchuk I; Lajoie BR; Mardaryev AN; Gdula MR; Sharov AA; Kohwi-Shigematsu T; Botchkarev VA; Fessing MY
PLoS Genet; 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1006966. PubMed ID: 28863138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Topologically associating domains and their long-range contacts are established during early G1 coincident with the establishment of the replication-timing program.
Dileep V; Ay F; Sima J; Vera DL; Noble WS; Gilbert DM
Genome Res; 2015 Aug; 25(8):1104-13. PubMed ID: 25995270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D-GNOME 2.0: a three-dimensional genome modeling engine for predicting structural variation-driven alterations of chromatin spatial structure in the human genome.
Wlasnowolski M; Sadowski M; Czarnota T; Jodkowska K; Szalaj P; Tang Z; Ruan Y; Plewczynski D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jul; 48(W1):W170-W176. PubMed ID: 32442297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional disorganization of the cancer genome occurs coincident with long-range genetic and epigenetic alterations.
Taberlay PC; Achinger-Kawecka J; Lun AT; Buske FA; Sabir K; Gould CM; Zotenko E; Bert SA; Giles KA; Bauer DC; Smyth GK; Stirzaker C; O'Donoghue SI; Clark SJ
Genome Res; 2016 Jun; 26(6):719-31. PubMed ID: 27053337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolutionary stability of topologically associating domains is associated with conserved gene regulation.
Krefting J; Andrade-Navarro MA; Ibn-Salem J
BMC Biol; 2018 Aug; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 30086749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications.
Franke M; Ibrahim DM; Andrey G; Schwarzer W; Heinrich V; Schöpflin R; Kraft K; Kempfer R; Jerković I; Chan WL; Spielmann M; Timmermann B; Wittler L; Kurth I; Cambiaso P; Zuffardi O; Houge G; Lambie L; Brancati F; Pombo A; Vingron M; Spitz F; Mundlos S
Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7624):265-269. PubMed ID: 27706140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulation associated modules reflect 3D genome modularity associated with chromatin activity.
Zheng L; Wang W
Nat Commun; 2022 Sep; 13(1):5281. PubMed ID: 36075900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developmentally regulated
Williamson I; Kane L; Devenney PS; Flyamer IM; Anderson E; Kilanowski F; Hill RE; Bickmore WA; Lettice LA
Development; 2019 Sep; 146(19):. PubMed ID: 31511252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures.
Hansen AS; Cattoglio C; Darzacq X; Tjian R
Nucleus; 2018 Jan; 9(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 29077530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D disorganization and rearrangement of genome provide insights into pathogenesis of NAFLD by integrated Hi-C, Nanopore, and RNA sequencing.
Xu L; Yin L; Qi Y; Tan X; Gao M; Peng J
Acta Pharm Sin B; 2021 Oct; 11(10):3150-3164. PubMed ID: 34729306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methods for the Analysis of Topologically Associating Domains (TADs).
Zufferey M; Tavernari D; Ciriello G
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2301():39-59. PubMed ID: 34415530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
