These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32000771)

  • 1. Experimental implantoplasty outcomes correlate with fibroblast growth in vitro.
    Beheshti Maal M; Aanerød Ellingsen S; Reseland JE; Verket A
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):25. PubMed ID: 32000771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of cell morphology and adhesion capacity of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium discs with different roughened surfaces: an in vitro scanning electron microscope analysis and cell culture study.
    Yildiz H; Sen E; Dalcik H; Meseli SE
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2023; 82(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 36000589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Titanium implant surface roughness after different implantoplasty protocols: A laboratory study.
    Yildiz H; Bertl K; Stavropoulos A
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Dec; 8(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 36069295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface roughness of dental implants and treatment time using six different implantoplasty procedures.
    Ramel CF; Lüssi A; Özcan M; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jul; 27(7):776-81. PubMed ID: 26355907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of standardised implantoplasty protocol on titanium surface roughness: an in-vitro study.
    Tawse-Smith A; Kota A; Jayaweera Y; Vuuren WJ; Ma S
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 Dec; 30(1):e137. PubMed ID: 28001245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Implantoplasty on Surface Roughness, Biofilm Formation, and Biocompatibility of Titanium Implants: A Systematic Review.
    Burgueño-Barris G; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):e111–e119. PubMed ID: 34157063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implantoplasty: Carbide burs vs diamond sonic tips. An in vitro study.
    Sivolella S; Brunello G; Michelon F; Concheri G; Graiff L; Meneghello R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Mar; 32(3):324-336. PubMed ID: 33341106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of implantoplasty on fracture resistance and surface roughness of standard diameter dental implants.
    Costa-Berenguer X; García-García M; Sánchez-Torres A; Sanz-Alonso M; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 28736922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Titanium Implant Characteristics After Implantoplasty: An In Vitro Study on Two Different Kinds of Instrumentation.
    Sahrmann P; Luso S; Mueller C; Ender A; Attin T; Stawarczyk B; Schmidlin PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1299-1305. PubMed ID: 31711072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficiency and thermal changes during implantoplasty in relation to bur type.
    Sharon E; Shapira L; Wilensky A; Abu-Hatoum R; Smidt A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 21745327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro pilot study comparing a novel implantoplasty sonic instrumentation protocol with a conventional protocol using burs.
    Tsampli A; Rues S; Kappel H; Rammelsberg P; Kappel S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Mar; 35(3):340-349. PubMed ID: 38225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Micro-morphometric assessment of titanium plasma-sprayed coating removal using burs for the treatment of peri-implant disease.
    Rimondini L; Cicognani Simoncini F; Carrassi A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11168203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of implantoplasty on the diameter, chemical surface composition, and biocompatibility of titanium implants.
    Schwarz F; John G; Becker J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2355-2361. PubMed ID: 28012063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite enamel and composite dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part I: roughness after treatments with tungsten carbide vs diamond burs.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):70-89. PubMed ID: 24757700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of implantoplasty in management of peri-implantitis: A systematic review.
    Dasgupta D; Banerjee S; Parasrampuria N; Pal D
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(3):210-217. PubMed ID: 37929359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Particle release from implantoplasty of dental implants and impact on cells.
    Barrak FN; Li S; Muntane AM; Jones JR
    Int J Implant Dent; 2020 Sep; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 32918144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enamel matrix derivative improves gingival fibroblast cell behavior cultured on titanium surfaces.
    Wang Y; Zhang Y; Jing D; Shuang Y; Miron RJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):685-95. PubMed ID: 26269319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of implantoplasty on strength of the implant-abutment complex.
    Chan HL; Oh WS; Ong HS; Fu JH; Steigmann M; Sierraalta M; Wang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1530-5. PubMed ID: 24278921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.