337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32001069)
21. Stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary lesions: comparison of different dose calculation algorithms for Oncentra MasterPlan®.
Troeller A; Garny S; Pachmann S; Kantz S; Gerum S; Manapov F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Söhn M
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Feb; 10():51. PubMed ID: 25888786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Limitations of analytical dose calculations for small field proton radiosurgery.
Geng C; Daartz J; Lam-Tin-Cheung K; Bussiere M; Shih HA; Paganetti H; Schuemann J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):246-257. PubMed ID: 27991438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of newly implemented dose calculation algorithms for multileaf collimator-based CyberKnife tumor-tracking radiotherapy.
Kawata K; Kamomae T; Oguchi H; Kawabata F; Okudaira K; Kawamura M; Ohtakara K; Itoh Y; Naganawa S
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1391-1403. PubMed ID: 31913508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of proton dose calculation algorithms on the interplay effect in PBS proton based SBRT lung plans.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 May; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34029212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of different photon beam energies in stereotactic radiosurgery with cones.
Ding GX; Homann KL
Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):5201-5211. PubMed ID: 37122235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetric verification using monte carlo calculations for tissue heterogeneity-corrected conformal treatment plans following RTOG 0813 dosimetric criteria for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Li J; Galvin J; Harrison A; Timmerman R; Yu Y; Xiao Y
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):508-13. PubMed ID: 22365630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Monte Carlo modeling of the ModuLeaf miniature MLC for small field dosimetry and quality assurance of the clinical treatment planning system.
Crop F; Reynaert N; Pittomvils G; Paelinck L; De Gersem W; De Wagter C; Vakaet L; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3275-90. PubMed ID: 17505102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. SU-E-T-505: BrainLab Plan Comparisons: Brain Scan Pencil Beam versus IPlan Monte Carlo.
Kowski M; Edwards J; Bauer L; DuBose R; Powell H
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part18):3821. PubMed ID: 28518507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An evaluation of Pencil Beam vs Monte Carlo calculations for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery.
Rembish J; Myers P; Kirby N; Saenz D; Rasmussen K; Crownover R; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
J BUON; 2020; 25(6):2731-2736. PubMed ID: 33455120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. SU-E-T-454: Dosimetric Comparison between Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Algorithms for SBRT Lung Treatment Using IPlan V4.1 TPS and CIRS Thorax Phantom.
Fernandez MC; Venencia C; Garrigó E; Caussa L
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3809. PubMed ID: 28517467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stereotactic radiosurgery with MLC-defined arcs: Verification of dosimetry, spatial accuracy, and end-to-end tests.
Brezovich IA; Wu X; Popple RA; Covington E; Cardan R; Shen S; Fiveash J; Bredel M; Guthrie B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 May; 20(5):84-98. PubMed ID: 30977297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A method for photon beam Monte Carlo multileaf collimator particle transport.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Kim JO; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3225-49. PubMed ID: 12361220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dosimetric differences between local failure and local controlled non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: A matched-pair study.
Zhuang T; Woody NM; Liu H; Cherian S; Reddy CA; Qi P; Magnelli A; Djemil T; Stephans KL; Xia P; Videtic GM
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 62(3):420-424. PubMed ID: 29399972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implementation and experimental validation of the high dose rate stereotactic treatment mode at Varian accelerators.
Hoffmann L
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 18759143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimation of dosimetric discrepancy due to use of Onyx™ embolic system in Stereotactic Radiosurgery/Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) planning.
Shaiju VS; Kumar R; Varadarajulu RK; Zacharia G; Phani D; Bhasi S; Puzhakkal N; Nair RK
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045006. PubMed ID: 33444267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of high-density embolization material on the absorbed dose in the target for Gamma Knife radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations.
Watanabe Y; Sandhu D; Warmington L; Moen S; Tummala R
J Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 125(Suppl 1):123-128. PubMed ID: 27903193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Plans Computed With Finite Size Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Algorithms Using the InCise™ Multileaf Collimator-Equipped Cyberknife
Galpayage Dona KNU; Shang C; Leventouri T
J Med Phys; 2020; 45(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 32355430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
