BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3200152)

  • 1. [A comparison of various methods of x-ray sensitometry].
    Maslov LA; Gurvich AM; Chikirdin EG; Il'ina MA; Popova TA
    Med Tekh; 1988; (5):36-41. PubMed ID: 3200152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
    Egyed M; Shearer DR
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The influence of the spectrum and the type of exposure on the contrast of double-sided coated x-ray film].
    Blendl C; Bollen R; Freytag KH
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1457475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Method of simulated screen sensitometry for asymmetric, low crossover medical x-ray films.
    Dickerson RE; Haus AG; Baker CW
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 8058018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of light and x-ray sensitometric responses of double-emulsion films for different processing conditions.
    Blendl C; Buhr E
    Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2420-6. PubMed ID: 11797944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Sensitometric characteristics of medical roentgenographic and fluorographic films. Sensitivity of the amplifying screens combined with a film].
    Gurvich AM; Erofeeva ND; Katomina RV; Maslov LA
    Med Tekh; 1976; (2):17-22. PubMed ID: 1030760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A gamma-ray sensitometer for film-screen combinations in diagnostic radiology].
    Nowotny R; Bliem J
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):117-20. PubMed ID: 4001775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality assurance from the viewpoint of the x-ray film industry].
    von Volkmann T
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):367-76. PubMed ID: 1410322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using light sensitometry to evaluate mammography film performance.
    West MS; Spelic DC
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):854-60. PubMed ID: 10841387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiologic exchange. Patient dose can be reduced by using 105 mm photofluoro spot films instead of the screen-film cassette spot radiographs.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(6):515-6. PubMed ID: 2762541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The sensitometric recording of verification films in high-volt therapy].
    Proske H; Steinkamp P
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1992 Jan; 168(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 1734587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets].
    Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The status and prospects of X-ray photographs marking technology].
    Li PA; Li GQ; Shen B; Huang JJ; Guo YB
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2001 Nov; 25(6):355-6, 361. PubMed ID: 12583272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
    Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitometric responses of selected medical radiographic films.
    Kofler JM; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 1947114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography].
    Gorelik FG
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Speed S sensitivity of film-screen systems and mode of action of different automatic illumination in general practice. I: Film-screen systems].
    Blendl C; Kondmann M; Müller J
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 9410006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of film-screen combination in a contrast detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 1: Contrast detail diagram].
    Hagemann G; Eichbaum G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 9340021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.