These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32002492)
21. The search for "Yvonne": a case example of the delineation of a grave using near-surface geophysical methods. Nobes DC J Forensic Sci; 2000 May; 45(3):715-21. PubMed ID: 10855986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessing the Influence of Buried Archaeology on Equine Locomotion Comparison with Ground Penetrating Radar Results. Linford N; MacKechnie-Guire R; Cassar M Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 32455930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implementation of and Experimentation with Ground-Penetrating Radar for Real-Time Automatic Detection of Buried Improvised Explosive Devices. Srimuk P; Boonpoonga A; Kaemarungsi K; Athikulwongse K; Dentri S Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detecting submerged objects: the application of side scan sonar to forensic contexts. Schultz JJ; Healy CA; Parker K; Lowers B Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):306-16. PubMed ID: 23890654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies. Wijewardana YN; Shilpadi AT; Mowjood MI; Kawamoto K; Galagedara LW Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Feb; 189(2):57. PubMed ID: 28091883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Monitoring of simulated clandestine graves of victims using UAVs, GPR, electrical tomography and conductivity over 4-8 years post-burial to aid forensic search investigators in Colombia, South America. Molina CM; Wisniewski KD; Salamanca A; Saumett M; Rojas C; Gómez H; Baena A; Pringle JK Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Feb; 355():111919. PubMed ID: 38218100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Monitoring of simulated clandestine graves of dismembered victims using UAVs, electrical tomography, and GPR over one year to aid investigations of human rights violations in Colombia, South America. Molina CM; Wisniewski K; Heaton V; Pringle JK; Avila EF; Herrera LA; Guerrero J; Saumett M; Echeverry R; Duarte M; Baena A J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34927732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Lightweight and Low-Power UAV-Borne Ground Penetrating Radar Design for Landmine Detection. Šipoš D; Gleich D Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32326550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term Geophysical Monitoring of Simulated Clandestine Graves using Electrical and Ground Penetrating Radar Methods: 4-6 Years After Burial. Pringle JK; Jervis JR; Roberts D; Dick HC; Wisniewski KD; Cassidy NJ; Cassella JP J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):309-321. PubMed ID: 27404604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The suitability of using domestic pigs (Sus spp.) as human proxies in the geophysical detection of clandestine graves. Berezowski V; Moffat I; Seckiner D; Crebert I; Ellis J; Mallett X J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):316-328. PubMed ID: 37904624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Geophysics and the search of freshwater bodies: a review. Parker R; Ruffell A; Hughes D; Pringle J Sci Justice; 2010 Sep; 50(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 20709275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sequential monitoring of burials containing large pig cadavers using ground-penetrating radar. Schultz JJ; Collins ME; Falsetti AB J Forensic Sci; 2006 May; 51(3):607-16. PubMed ID: 16696709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Under-water scene investigation using ground penetrating radar (GPR) in the search for a sunken jet ski, Northern Ireland. Ruffell A Sci Justice; 2006; 46(4):221-30. PubMed ID: 17500424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection of tree roots and determination of root diameters by ground penetrating radar under optimal conditions. Barton CV; Montagu KD Tree Physiol; 2004 Dec; 24(12):1323-31. PubMed ID: 15465695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. State-of-the-Art Review of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Applications for Railway Ballast Inspection. Wang S; Liu G; Jing G; Feng Q; Liu H; Guo Y Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of magnetic susceptibility as a forensic search tool. Pringle JK; Giubertoni M; Cassidy NJ; Wisniewski KD; Hansen JD; Linford NT; Daniels RM Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jan; 246():31-42. PubMed ID: 25460105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Controlled GPR grave research: comparison of reflection profiles between 500 and 250 MHz antennae. Schultz JJ; Martin MM Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):64-9. PubMed ID: 21237591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Experimental forensic scenes for the characterization of ground-penetrating radar wave response. Solla M; Riveiro B; Álvarez MX; Arias P Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jul; 220(1-3):50-8. PubMed ID: 22306187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of Data Processing and Antenna Frequency on Spatial Structure Modelling of GPR Data. De Benedetto D; Quarto R; Castrignanò A; Palumbo DA Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16430-47. PubMed ID: 26184190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]