BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32002641)

  • 1. Can breast MRI accurately exclude malignancy in mammographic architectural distortion?
    Amitai Y; Scaranelo A; Menes TS; Fleming R; Kulkarni S; Ghai S; Freitas V
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2751-2760. PubMed ID: 32002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
    Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is breast MRI helpful in the evaluation of inconclusive mammographic findings?
    Moy L; Elias K; Patel V; Lee J; Babb JS; Toth HK; Mercado CL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):986-93. PubMed ID: 19770320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Utility of Breast MRI in the Diagnosis of Malignancy After Inconclusive or Equivocal Mammographic Diagnostic Evaluation.
    Giess CS; Chikarmane SA; Sippo DA; Birdwell RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1378-1385. PubMed ID: 28267372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management.
    Pujara AC; Hui J; Wang LC
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():133-137. PubMed ID: 30639524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problem-solving breast MRI: useful or a source of new problems?
    Taşkın F; Polat Y; Erdoğdu İH; Türkdoğan FT; Öztürk VS; Özbaş S
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018 Sep; 24(5):255-261. PubMed ID: 30211678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?
    Baltzer PAT; Bennani-Baiti B; Stöttinger A; Bumberger A; Kapetas P; Clauser P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():70-74. PubMed ID: 29122667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Architectural Distortion on Mammography: Correlation With Pathologic Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy.
    Bahl M; Baker JA; Kinsey EN; Ghate SV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1339-45. PubMed ID: 26587943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast as a problem-solving method: to be or not to be?
    Oztekin PS; Kosar PN
    Breast J; 2014; 20(6):622-31. PubMed ID: 25200378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Our Radiological Experience on B3 Lesions: Correlation Between Mammographic and MRI Findings With Histologic Definitive Result.
    Santucci D; Faiella E; Calabrese A; Favale L; Zobel BB; de Felice C
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(5):e643-e653. PubMed ID: 31377083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast MRI used as a problem-solving tool reliably excludes malignancy.
    Spick C; Szolar DHM; Preidler KW; Tillich M; Reittner P; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):61-64. PubMed ID: 25454098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management of high-risk breast lesions found on mammogram or ultrasound: the value of contrast-enhanced MRI to exclude malignancy.
    Hammersley JA; Partridge SC; Blitzer GC; Deitch S; Rahbar H
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 49():174-180. PubMed ID: 29571172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of Mammographic Architectural Distortion Based on Contrast-enhanced MRI and US Correlation.
    DiPrete O; Wei CJ; Phillips J; Fishman MDC; Slanetz PJ; Lotfi P; Brook A; Dialani V
    J Breast Imaging; 2023 Jul; 5(4):425-435. PubMed ID: 38416901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographically screen-detected asymmetric densities with architectural distortion and normal ultrasound at assessment: Value of MRI as a problem-solving tool.
    Price J; Chen SW
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jun; 59(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 25707846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
    Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion.
    Patel BK; Naylor ME; Kosiorek HE; Lopez-Alvarez YM; Miller AM; Pizzitola VJ; Pockaj BA
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():44-52. PubMed ID: 28723585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
    Berg WA; Madsen KS; Schilling K; Tartar M; Pisano ED; Larsen LH; Narayanan D; Kalinyak JE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jan; 198(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 22194501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of Breast MRI for Further Evaluation of Equivocal Findings on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Niell BL; Bhatt K; Dang P; Humphrey K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 30207789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.