191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32002779)
1. A deep learning approach for the blind logP prediction in SAMPL6 challenge.
Prasad S; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):535-542. PubMed ID: 32002779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantum chemical predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients applied to the SAMPL6 logP blind challenge.
Jones MR; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):485-493. PubMed ID: 32002778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. COSMO-RS based predictions for the SAMPL6 logP challenge.
Loschen C; Reinisch J; Klamt A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):385-392. PubMed ID: 31773462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.
Işık M; Levorse D; Mobley DL; Rhodes T; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):405-420. PubMed ID: 31858363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of molecular dynamics fingerprints (MDFPs) in SAMPL6 octanol-water log P blind challenge.
Wang S; Riniker S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 31745704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of molecular representations for lipophilicity quantitative structure-property relationships with results from the SAMPL6 logP Prediction Challenge.
Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):523-534. PubMed ID: 31933037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.
Işık M; Bergazin TD; Fox T; Rizzi A; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):335-370. PubMed ID: 32107702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multitask machine learning models for predicting lipophilicity (logP) in the SAMPL7 challenge.
Lenselink EB; Stouten PFW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Aug; 35(8):901-909. PubMed ID: 34273053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting partition coefficients of drug-like molecules in the SAMPL6 challenge with Drude polarizable force fields.
Ding Y; Xu Y; Qian C; Chen J; Zhu J; Huang H; Shi Y; Huang J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):421-435. PubMed ID: 31960252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SAMPL6 blind predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.
Procacci P; Guarnieri G
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):371-384. PubMed ID: 31624982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6-[Formula: see text] molecules using molecular dynamics simulations with OPLS-AA, AMBER and CHARMM force fields.
Fan S; Iorga BI; Beckstein O
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):543-560. PubMed ID: 31960254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of the n-octanol/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 blind challenge from MST continuum solvation calculations.
Zamora WJ; Pinheiro S; German K; Ràfols C; Curutchet C; Luque FJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):443-451. PubMed ID: 31776809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LogP prediction performance with the SMD solvation model and the M06 density functional family for SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge molecules.
Guan D; Lui R; Matthews S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):511-522. PubMed ID: 31939103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol-water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory.
Tielker N; Tomazic D; Eberlein L; Güssregen S; Kast SM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 31981015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting octanol/water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6 challenge using the SM12, SM8, and SMD solvation models.
Ouimet JA; Paluch AS
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):575-588. PubMed ID: 32002781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A blind SAMPL6 challenge: insight into the octanol-water partition coefficients of drug-like molecules via a DFT approach.
Arslan E; Findik BK; Aviyente V
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):463-470. PubMed ID: 31939104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. COSMO-RS predictions of logP in the SAMPL7 blind challenge.
Warnau J; Wichmann K; Reinisch J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):813-818. PubMed ID: 34125358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A neural network based prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients using atomic5 fragmental descriptors.
Molnár L; Keseru GM; Papp A; Gulyás Z; Darvas F
Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2004 Feb; 14(4):851-3. PubMed ID: 15012980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SAMPL6 logP challenge: machine learning and quantum mechanical approaches.
Patel P; Kuntz DM; Jones MR; Brooks BR; Wilson AK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):495-510. PubMed ID: 32002780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computational prediction of octanol-water partition coefficient based on the extended solvent-contact model.
Kim T; Park H
J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Jul; 60():108-17. PubMed ID: 26142695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
