BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32002780)

  • 1. SAMPL6 logP challenge: machine learning and quantum mechanical approaches.
    Patel P; Kuntz DM; Jones MR; Brooks BR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):495-510. PubMed ID: 32002780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A blind SAMPL6 challenge: insight into the octanol-water partition coefficients of drug-like molecules via a DFT approach.
    Arslan E; Findik BK; Aviyente V
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):463-470. PubMed ID: 31939104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantum chemical predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients applied to the SAMPL6 logP blind challenge.
    Jones MR; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):485-493. PubMed ID: 32002778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A deep learning approach for the blind logP prediction in SAMPL6 challenge.
    Prasad S; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):535-542. PubMed ID: 32002779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LogP prediction performance with the SMD solvation model and the M06 density functional family for SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge molecules.
    Guan D; Lui R; Matthews S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):511-522. PubMed ID: 31939103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of molecular representations for lipophilicity quantitative structure-property relationships with results from the SAMPL6 logP Prediction Challenge.
    Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):523-534. PubMed ID: 31933037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. COSMO-RS based predictions for the SAMPL6 logP challenge.
    Loschen C; Reinisch J; Klamt A
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):385-392. PubMed ID: 31773462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol-water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory.
    Tielker N; Tomazic D; Eberlein L; Güssregen S; Kast SM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 31981015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine Learning Methods to Predict Density Functional Theory B3LYP Energies of HOMO and LUMO Orbitals.
    Pereira F; Xiao K; Latino DA; Wu C; Zhang Q; Aires-de-Sousa J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jan; 57(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 28033004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.
    Işık M; Bergazin TD; Fox T; Rizzi A; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):335-370. PubMed ID: 32107702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantum-mechanical property prediction of solvated drug molecules: what have we learned from a decade of SAMPL blind prediction challenges?
    Tielker N; Eberlein L; Hessler G; Schmidt KF; Güssregen S; Kast SM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Apr; 35(4):453-472. PubMed ID: 33079358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
    Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of the n-octanol/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 blind challenge from MST continuum solvation calculations.
    Zamora WJ; Pinheiro S; German K; Ràfols C; Curutchet C; Luque FJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):443-451. PubMed ID: 31776809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Leveraging DFT and Molecular Fragmentation for Chemically Accurate p
    Sanchez AJ; Maier S; Raghavachari K
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Feb; 64(3):712-723. PubMed ID: 38301279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High accuracy quantum-chemistry-based calculation and blind prediction of macroscopic pKa values in the context of the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Pracht P; Wilcken R; Udvarhelyi A; Rodde S; Grimme S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1139-1149. PubMed ID: 30141103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multitask machine learning models for predicting lipophilicity (logP) in the SAMPL7 challenge.
    Lenselink EB; Stouten PFW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Aug; 35(8):901-909. PubMed ID: 34273053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SAMPL7 blind challenge: quantum-mechanical prediction of partition coefficients and acid dissociation constants for small drug-like molecules.
    Fındık BK; Haslak ZP; Arslan E; Aviyente V
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):841-851. PubMed ID: 34164769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absolute and relative pK
    Zeng Q; Jones MR; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 30128926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partition coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge using transfer free energies.
    Jones MR; Brooks BR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 27646287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of molecular dynamics fingerprints (MDFPs) in SAMPL6 octanol-water log P blind challenge.
    Wang S; Riniker S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 31745704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.