359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32003825)
1. Evaluation of the Informational Content and Readability of US Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.
Gagne SM; Fintelmann FJ; Flores EJ; McDermott S; Mendoza DP; Petranovic M; Price MC; Stowell JT; Little BP
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jan; 3(1):e1920431. PubMed ID: 32003825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. United States lung cancer screening program websites: radiology representation, multimedia and multilingual content.
Little BP; Gagne SM; Fintelmann FJ; McDermott S; Mendoza DP; Petranovic M; Price MC; Stowell JT; Narayan AK; Flores EJ
Clin Imaging; 2022 Jun; 86():83-88. PubMed ID: 35367867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Available Online Information Regarding Treatment for Vitreous Floaters.
Kalavar M; Hubschman S; Hudson J; Kuriyan AE; Sridhar J
Semin Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 36(1-2):58-63. PubMed ID: 33599190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.
De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS
J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lung cancer screening: assessment of health literacy and readability of online educational resources.
Haas K; Brillante C; Sharp L; Elzokaky AK; Pasquinelli M; Feldman L; Kovitz KL; Joo M
BMC Public Health; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1356. PubMed ID: 30526544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the Accuracy of Online Information Regarding Trigger Finger.
Hinds RM; Gottschalk MB; Muppavarapu RC; Naik AA; Yang SS; Capo JT
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Jun; 21(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 27454633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-Approved Teams' Websites for Patient-Oriented Content and Readability.
Alfonso AR; DeMitchell-Rodriguez EM; Ramly EP; Noel DY; Levy-Lambert D; Wang MM; Kantar RS; Flores RL
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1213-1219. PubMed ID: 31129984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.
Clark SD; Reuland DS; Enyioha C; Jonas DE
JAMA Intern Med; 2020 Jun; 180(6):824-830. PubMed ID: 32282024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.
Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT
J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability assessment of patient education materials on major otolaryngology association websites.
Eloy JA; Li S; Kasabwala K; Agarwal N; Hansberry DR; Baredes S; Setzen M
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 22864405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery.
Miles RC; Baird GL; Choi P; Falomo E; Dibble EH; Garg M
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 30694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
