These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32004913)

  • 1. Assessing the global resilience of water quality sensor placement strategies within water distribution systems.
    Zhang Q; Zheng F; Kapelan Z; Savic D; He G; Ma Y
    Water Res; 2020 Apr; 172():115527. PubMed ID: 32004913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An efficient multi-objective optimization method for water quality sensor placement within water distribution systems considering contamination probability variations.
    He G; Zhang T; Zheng F; Zhang Q
    Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():165-175. PubMed ID: 29945032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topological attributes of network resilience: A study in water distribution systems.
    Meng F; Fu G; Farmani R; Sweetapple C; Butler D
    Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():376-386. PubMed ID: 29986247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient k-means clustering and greedy selection-based reduction of nodal search space for optimization of sensor placement in the water distribution networks.
    Gautam DK; Kotecha P; Subbiah S
    Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118666. PubMed ID: 35709596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting the best location of water quality sensors in water distribution networks by considering the importance of nodes and contaminations using NSGA-III (case study: Zahedan water distribution network, Iran).
    Harif S; Azizyan G; Dehghani Darmian M; Givehchi M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(18):53229-53252. PubMed ID: 36853532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal sensor placement for detecting organophosphate intrusions into water distribution systems.
    Ohar Z; Lahav O; Ostfeld A
    Water Res; 2015 Apr; 73():193-203. PubMed ID: 25662513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controllability analysis as a pre-selection method for sensor placement in water distribution systems.
    Diao K; Rauch W
    Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(16):6097-108. PubMed ID: 23948563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global resilience analysis of water distribution systems.
    Diao K; Sweetapple C; Farmani R; Fu G; Ward S; Butler D
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():383-393. PubMed ID: 27750127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do resilience metrics of water distribution systems really assess resilience? A critical review.
    Leštáková M; Logan KT; Rehm IS; Pelz PF; Friesen J
    Water Res; 2024 Jan; 248():120820. PubMed ID: 37956607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Network hydraulics inclusion in water quality event detection using multiple sensor stations data.
    Oliker N; Ostfeld A
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():47-58. PubMed ID: 25996752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating fuzzy logic with Pearson correlation to optimize contaminant detection in water distribution system with uncertainty analyses.
    Osmani SA; Banik BK; Ali H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jun; 191(7):441. PubMed ID: 31203453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Operation of remote mobile sensors for security of drinking water distribution systems.
    Perelman BL; Ostfeld A
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4217-26. PubMed ID: 23764572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contamination event detection using multiple types of conventional water quality sensors in source water.
    Liu S; Che H; Smith K; Chen L
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Aug; 16(8):2028-38. PubMed ID: 24953418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Domain Knowledge-Based Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning for Sensor Placement.
    Song M; Hu C; Gong W; Yan X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of the possible scenarios for the optimal locating of quality sensors in the water distribution networks with uncertain contamination.
    Jafari H; Rajaee T; Nazif S
    J Water Health; 2020 Oct; 18(5):704-721. PubMed ID: 33095194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deep fuzzy mapping nonparametric model for real-time demand estimation in water distribution systems: A new perspective.
    Zhang Q; Yang J; Zhang W; Kumar M; Liu J; Liu J; Li X
    Water Res; 2023 Aug; 241():120145. PubMed ID: 37270943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multivariate based event detection method and performance comparison with two baseline methods.
    Liu S; Smith K; Che H
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():109-18. PubMed ID: 25996758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk-based framework for optimizing residual chlorine in large water distribution systems.
    Sharif MN; Farahat A; Haider H; Al-Zahrani MA; Rodriguez MJ; Sadiq R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Jul; 189(7):307. PubMed ID: 28573352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal and objective placement of sensors in water distribution systems using information theory.
    Khorshidi MS; Nikoo MR; Sadegh M
    Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():218-228. PubMed ID: 29960176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognosis of Water Quality Sensors Using Advanced Data Analytics: Application to the Barcelona Drinking Water Network.
    Garcia D; Puig V; Quevedo J
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 32121444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.