140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32004995)
1. Comparative analysis of static and dynamic bare footprint dimensions in a north Indian population.
Mukhra R; Krishan K; Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Kanchan T
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110169. PubMed ID: 32004995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The contact area of static and dynamic footprints: Forensic implications.
Mukhra R; Krishan K; Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Kanchan T
Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 33736852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-dimensional metric comparisons between dynamic bare footprints and insole foot impressions-forensic implications.
Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 32111287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ghosting phenomenon in static and dynamic footprints in India and the United States.
Ansert E; Nirenberg MS; Mukhra R; Kanchan T; Krishan K
Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):406-413. PubMed ID: 37169466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-dimensional metric comparison between dynamic bare and sock-clad footprints for its forensic implications - A pilot study.
Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
Sci Justice; 2019 Jan; 59(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 30654967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of standing fleshed foot and walking and jumping bare footprint measurements.
Howsam N; Bridgen A
Sci Justice; 2018 Sep; 58(5):346-354. PubMed ID: 30193660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the length and width of static inked two-dimensional bare footprints found on a hard compared to a soft surface.
Curran M; Holmes I
Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):448-451. PubMed ID: 31256817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-dimensional linear analysis of dynamic bare footprints: A comparison of measurement techniques.
Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 31472800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of footprint and its parts for stature estimation in Indian population.
Kanchan T; Krishan K; ShyamSundar S; Aparna KR; Jaiswal S
Foot (Edinb); 2012 Sep; 22(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 22456109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of the Podotrack in forensic podiatry for collection and analysis of bare footprints using the Reel method of measurement.
Burrow JG
Sci Justice; 2016 May; 56(3):216-222. PubMed ID: 27162020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chasing ghosts: An investigation of the ghosting phenomenon in footprints.
Nirenberg M; Ansert E; Campbell J; Curran M
Sci Justice; 2020 Sep; 60(5):432-437. PubMed ID: 32873383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of assessing the ghosting phenomenon in dynamic footprints when estimating stature - Forensic implications.
Švábová P; Hanzelyová K; Chovancová M; Masnicová S; Beňuš R
Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):322-332. PubMed ID: 38735669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emergence of forensic podiatry--A novel sub-discipline of forensic sciences.
Krishan K; Kanchan T; DiMaggio JA
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():16-27. PubMed ID: 26163192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability of footprint ridge density and its use in estimation of sex in forensic examinations.
Krishan K; Kanchan T; Pathania A; Sharma R; DiMaggio JA
Med Sci Law; 2015 Oct; 55(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 25413487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating actual foot size from a static bare foot print in a White British Population.
Curran M; Gillespie L; Melville S; Campbell J; Kagan B
Sci Justice; 2019 May; 59(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 31054820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of stature and body weight from static and dynamic footprints - Forensic implications and validity of non-colouring cream method.
Švábová Nee Uhrová P; Caplova Z; Beňuš R; Chovancová Nee Kondeková M; Masnicová S
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111105. PubMed ID: 34800909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bare footprint metric analysis methods for comparison and identification in forensic examinations: A review of literature.
Mukhra R; Krishan K; Kanchan T
J Forensic Leg Med; 2018 Aug; 58():101-112. PubMed ID: 29777981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Forensic measurement comparison of foot insole impressions.
Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Minetola TJ; Esbenson AM; Samuel AL; Campbell J
Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):264-268. PubMed ID: 38735661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of stature from footprint and foot outline dimensions in Gujjars of North India.
Krishan K
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):93-101. PubMed ID: 17590549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of stature from static and dynamic footprints.
Reel S; Rouse S; Vernon W; Doherty P
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):283.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22154435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
