201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32005188)
1. Caesarean section rates from Malaysian tertiary hospitals using Robson's 10-group classification.
Karalasingam SD; Jeganathan R; Jegasothy R; Reidpath DD
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jan; 20(1):64. PubMed ID: 32005188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robson's Group 2 Criteria among Total Caesarean Sections in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Gautam P; Karki C; Adhikari A
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2021 Nov; 59(243):1098-1101. PubMed ID: 35199745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Caesarean section rates analysed using Robson's 10-Group Classification System: a cross-sectional study at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.
Abdo AA; Hinderaker SG; Tekle AG; Lindtjørn B
BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e039098. PubMed ID: 33115900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Caesarean Section Rates at Kathmandu Model Hospital Using the Robson's Ten Group Classification System.
Poudel R; Dangal G; Karki A; Pradhan HK; Shrestha R; Bhattachan K; Bajracharya N; Tiwari KD; Bharti S
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2020 Jan; 17(4):491-494. PubMed ID: 32001854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Secular trends in caesarean section rates over 20 years in a regional obstetric unit in Hong Kong.
Chung WH; Kong CW; To WW
Hong Kong Med J; 2017 Aug; 23(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 28684651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of cesarean section rates and its indications using robson's classification at a tertiary care hospital, Manipur.
Janani L; Christina S; Akoijam BS; Nameirakpam D; Laiphrakpam RS
Indian J Public Health; 2022; 66(4):434-438. PubMed ID: 37039169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.
Mayne L; Liu C; Tanaka K; Amoako A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 33938362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables.
Colais P; Fantini MP; Fusco D; Carretta E; Stivanello E; Lenzi J; Pieri G; Perucci CA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Jun; 12():54. PubMed ID: 22720844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment Of Caesarean Section Rate Using Robson Ten Group Classification System In A Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross Sectional Study.
Nazeer S; Rehman M; Khan S; Sadiq S; Bano K
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(2):275-279. PubMed ID: 37422820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria.
Akadri AA; Imaralu JO; Salami OF; Nwankpa CC; Adepoju AA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Apr; 23(1):243. PubMed ID: 37046219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.
Kelly S; Sprague A; Fell DB; Murphy P; Aelicks N; Guo Y; Fahey J; Lauzon L; Scott H; Lee L; Kinniburgh B; Prince M; Walker M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Mar; 35(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 23470108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.
Zeitlin J; Durox M; Macfarlane A; Alexander S; Heller G; Loghi M; Nijhuis J; Sól Ólafsdóttir H; Mierzejewska E; Gissler M; Blondel B;
BJOG; 2021 Aug; 128(9):1444-1453. PubMed ID: 33338307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.
Zimmo MW; Laine K; Hassan S; Bottcher B; Fosse E; Ali-Masri H; Zimmo K; Sørum Falk R; Lieng M; Vikanes Å
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022875. PubMed ID: 30361403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the Caesarean Decision by Robson Classification: A Population-Based Study by 5,323,500 Livebirth Data.
Tontus HO; Nebioglu S
Ann Glob Health; 2020 Aug; 86(1):101. PubMed ID: 32874932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting Caesarean Delivery in Quebec Using the Robson Classification System.
Roberge S; Dubé E; Blouin S; Chaillet N
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Mar; 39(3):152-156. PubMed ID: 28343556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysing the likelihood of caesarean birth after implementation of the two-childbirth policy in China, using the Ten Group Classification System.
Wen J; Chen Q; Luo Q
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):336-341. PubMed ID: 31354082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in Indigenous and non-Indigenous caesarean section births in the Northern Territory of Australia, 1986-2012: a total population-based study.
Thompson F; Dempsey K; Mishra G
BJOG; 2016 Oct; 123(11):1814-23. PubMed ID: 26777399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in caesarean rates across women's socio-economic status by diverse obstetric indications: Cross-sectional study.
Adhikari K; McNeil DA; McDonald S; Patel AB; Metcalfe A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 32(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 29975426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caesarean section at full cervical dilatation.
Davis G; Fleming T; Ford K; Mouawad MR; Ludlow J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Dec; 55(6):565-71. PubMed ID: 26223774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births.
Liang J; Mu Y; Li X; Tang W; Wang Y; Liu Z; Huang X; Scherpbier RW; Guo S; Li M; Dai L; Deng K; Deng C; Li Q; Kang L; Zhu J; Ronsmans C
BMJ; 2018 Mar; 360():k817. PubMed ID: 29506980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
