These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32005481)

  • 1. Meta-analysis: Random-effects model.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Feb; 157(2):280-282. PubMed ID: 32005481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Demystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis.
    Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2014 May; 17(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 24692250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses.
    Al Khalaf MM; Thalib L; Doi SA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 20409685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Knapp G; Biggerstaff BJ; Hartung J
    Biom J; 2006 Apr; 48(2):271-85. PubMed ID: 16708778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach.
    Nagashima K; Noma H; Furukawa TA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1689-1702. PubMed ID: 29745296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis and evidence.
    Goodman SN
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):188-204. PubMed ID: 2666026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part I--How to choose effect measure and statistical model.
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 25404668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis: Fixed-effect model.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Jan; 157(1):134-137. PubMed ID: 31901272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Random-effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: review, issues, and illustrations.
    Cheung MW; Cheung SF
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):140-55. PubMed ID: 27286900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance of trends in the interpretation of an overall odds ratio in the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 1994 Feb; 13(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 8202653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A bivariate approach to meta-analysis.
    Van Houwelingen HC; Zwinderman KH; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2273-84. PubMed ID: 7907813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Bayesian nonparametric meta-analysis model.
    Karabatsos G; Talbott E; Walker SG
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 26035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian robustness in meta-analysis for studies with zero responses.
    Vázquez FJ; Moreno E; Negrín MA; Martel M
    Pharm Stat; 2016 May; 15(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 26913715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical Models and Methods for Network Meta-Analysis.
    Madden LV; Piepho HP; Paul PA
    Phytopathology; 2016 Aug; 106(8):792-806. PubMed ID: 27111798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comment on: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Coory MD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):932; author reply 933. PubMed ID: 19349478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis in evidence-based healthcare: a paradigm shift away from random effects is overdue.
    Doi SAR; Furuya-Kanamori L; Thalib L; Barendregt JJ
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2017 Dec; 15(4):152-160. PubMed ID: 29135532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.