110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32006602)
1. Association of sex, location, and experience with online patient ratings of dermatologists.
Waqas B; Cooley V; Lipner SR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Sep; 83(3):954-955. PubMed ID: 32006602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Social media activity is associated with higher physician ratings by patients.
Damanpour S; Nazarian R; Deutsch A; Hosgood HD; Kim J; McLellan BN
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 May; 84(5):1455-1458. PubMed ID: 32622896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors impacting patient ratings of Mohs micrographic surgeons: Lessons gleaned from analysis of 17,527 online reviews.
Trager MH; Ensslin CE; Fan W; Samie FH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Dec; 83(6):1825-1827. PubMed ID: 32450101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dermatologists' Perceptions and Confidence in Cosmetic Care for Male Patients.
Shah P; Cartron AM; Roman J; Zampella J
Dermatol Surg; 2021 Feb; 47(2):211-213. PubMed ID: 32976119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current status of online rating of Australian doctors.
Atkinson S
Aust J Prim Health; 2014; 20(3):222-3. PubMed ID: 24852125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Surgeon Gender on Online Physician Reviews.
Marrero K; King E; Fingeret AL
J Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 245():510-515. PubMed ID: 31446193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study.
Emmert M; Meszmer N; Schlesinger M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb; 18(1):82. PubMed ID: 29402321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychodermatology: knowledge, awareness, and attitude of dermatologists in Kazakhstan.
Markabayeva A; Ospanova S; Jafferany M
Int J Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 59(4):e105-e109. PubMed ID: 31364766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study.
Liu JJ; Matelski JJ; Bell CM
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e76. PubMed ID: 29514775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency of Syphilis Diagnoses by Dermatologists.
Cossman JP; Fournier JB
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jul; 153(7):718-719. PubMed ID: 28467547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What patients see online: assessing the online identities of Pennsylvania dermatologists.
Karanfilian KM; De Guzman E; Kim C; Madill E; Ayyaswami V; Kamath P; Agarwal N; Koch E; Prabhu AV
Dermatol Online J; 2019 Sep; 25(9):. PubMed ID: 31738838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Abdominoplasty.
Qiu CS; Hockney SM; Turin SY; Dorfman RG; Kim JYS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Mar; 143(3):734-742. PubMed ID: 30817644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors Impacting Online Ratings for Otolaryngologists.
Calixto NE; Chiao W; Durr ML; Jiang N
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Aug; 127(8):521-526. PubMed ID: 29882425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Online ratings of spinal deformity surgeons: analysis of 634 surgeons.
Melone G; Brodell J; Hernandez C; Menga E; Balkissoon R; Liu X; Zhang J; Mesfin A
Spine Deform; 2020 Feb; 8(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 31925764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
