142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32006672)
1. Time extrapolation in regulatory risk assessment: The impact of study differences on the extrapolation factors.
Escher SE; Mangelsdorf I; Hoffmann-Doerr S; Partosch F; Karwath A; Schroeder K; Zapf A; Batke M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Apr; 112():104584. PubMed ID: 32006672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of time extrapolation factors based on the database RepDose.
Batke M; Escher S; Hoffmann-Doerr S; Melber C; Messinger H; Mangelsdorf I
Toxicol Lett; 2011 Aug; 205(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 21640805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment for irritating chemicals - Derivation of extrapolation factors.
Mangelsdorf I; Schröder K; Escher SE; Kolossa-Gehring M; Debiak M
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2021 Mar; 232():113668. PubMed ID: 33333487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the uncertainty factor for subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation: statistical analysis of toxicity data.
Pieters MN; Kramer HJ; Slob W
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Apr; 27(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 9671565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time extrapolation and interspecies extrapolation for locally acting substances in case of limited toxicological data.
Kalberlah F; Föst U; Schneider K
Ann Occup Hyg; 2002 Mar; 46(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 12074027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distributions for time, interspecies and intraspecies extrapolation for deriving occupational exposure limits.
Dilger M; Schneider K; Drossard C; Ott H; Kaiser E
J Appl Toxicol; 2022 May; 42(5):898-912. PubMed ID: 35187686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oral-to-inhalation route extrapolation in occupational health risk assessment: a critical assessment.
Rennen MA; Bouwman T; Wilschut A; Bessems JG; Heer CD
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Feb; 39(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 14746775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of route-to-route extrapolation factors based on assessment of repeated dose toxicity studies compiled in the database RepDose
Schröder K; Escher SE; Hoffmann-Dörr S; Kühne R; Simetska N; Mangelsdorf I
Toxicol Lett; 2016 Nov; 261():32-40. PubMed ID: 27553675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of ratio distributions based on the NOAEL and the benchmark approach for subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation.
Bokkers BG; Slob W
Toxicol Sci; 2005 Jun; 85(2):1033-40. PubMed ID: 15772368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chemical warfare agents: estimating oral reference doses.
Opresko DM; Young RA; Faust RA; Talmage SS; Watson AP; Ross RH; Davidson KA; King J
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 1998; 156():1-183. PubMed ID: 9597943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of points of departure between subchronic and chronic toxicity studies on food additives, food contaminants and natural food constituents.
Guth S; Roth A; Engeli B; Lachenmeier DW; Cartus AT; Hüser S; Baum M; Diel P; Eisenbrand G; Hengstler JG; Humpf HU; Joost HG; Lampen A; Leist M; Marko D; Steinberg P; Mally A; Zarn JA
Food Chem Toxicol; 2020 Dec; 146():111784. PubMed ID: 32998026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chemical risk assessment and uncertainty associated with extrapolation across exposure duration.
Pohl HR; Chou CH; Ruiz P; Holler JS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Jun; 57(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19944126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Derivation of Occupational Thresholds of Toxicological Concern for Systemically Acting Noncarcinogenic Organic Chemicals.
Chebekoue SF; Krishnan K
Toxicol Sci; 2017 Nov; 160(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 29036659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of dogs as second species in regulatory testing of pesticides. Part II: Subacute, subchronic and chronic studies in the dog.
Spielmann H; Gerbracht U
Arch Toxicol; 2001 Mar; 75(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11368059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A quantitative comparison of points of departure between 28-day and 90-day repeated dose studies with a proposed extrapolation factor.
Lampe BJ; Fuller E; Kuppusamy SP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Feb; 92():189-200. PubMed ID: 29242155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Study parameters influencing NOAEL and LOAEL in toxicity feeding studies for pesticides: exposure duration versus dose decrement, dose spacing, group size and chemical class.
Zarn JA; Engeli BE; Schlatter JR
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Nov; 61(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 21875639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of novel uncertainty factors and thresholds of toxicological concern for health hazard and risk assessment: Application to cleaning product ingredients.
Wang Z; Scott WC; Williams ES; Ciarlo M; DeLeo PC; Brooks BW
Environ Int; 2018 Apr; 113():357-376. PubMed ID: 29452931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interspecies extrapolation based on the RepDose database--a probabilistic approach.
Escher SE; Batke M; Hoffmann-Doerr S; Messinger H; Mangelsdorf I
Toxicol Lett; 2013 Apr; 218(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 23395978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The significance of the subchronic toxicity in the dietary risk assessment of pesticides.
Zarn JA; Hänggi E; Kuchen A; Schlatter JR
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Oct; 58(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20406660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
