These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32006967)

  • 1. Electric-acoustic interaction measurements in cochlear-implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing using electrocochleography.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):350. PubMed ID: 32006967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.
    Kim JS; Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amplitude growth of intracochlear electrocochleography in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Feb; 147(2):1147. PubMed ID: 32113296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of electroneural versus electrophonic stimulation on psychoacoustic electric-acoustic masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
    Kipping D; Krüger B; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():108036. PubMed ID: 32736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplitude Growth Functions of Auditory Nerve Responses to Electric Pulse Stimulation With Varied Interphase Gaps in Cochlear Implant Users With Ipsilateral Residual Hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014137. PubMed ID: 34181493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
    Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):868-882. PubMed ID: 31592902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Computational Model of a Single Auditory Nerve Fiber for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Kipping D; Nogueira W
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36333573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [An overview of the studies on combined electric and acoustic stimulation of auditory system].
    Guan T; Zhu Z; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):1146-9. PubMed ID: 19947508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.