These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32006976)

  • 1. The impact of speaking style on speech recognition in quiet and multi-talker babble in adult cochlear implant users.
    Rodman C; Moberly AC; Janse E; Başkent D; Tamati TN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):101. PubMed ID: 32006976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Xu A; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 23238527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relation between speaking-style categorization and speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    JASA Express Lett; 2023 Mar; 3(3):035201. PubMed ID: 37003708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of High-Variability Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Faulkner KF; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2023 Oct; 34(9-10):217-224. PubMed ID: 37748726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spoken word recognition in adolescent cochlear implant users during quiet and multispeaker babble conditions.
    Tobey EA; Shin S; Sundarrajan M; Geers AE
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21307815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Moore AN
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults.
    Goupell MJ; Draves GT; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244632. PubMed ID: 33373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the American English Matrix Test with Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Potts LG; Olivo AM; Reeder RM; Firszt JB
    Int J Audiol; 2024 May; 63(5):342-348. PubMed ID: 36896781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of auditory working memory to speech understanding in mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Tao D; Deng R; Jiang Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Chen B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99096. PubMed ID: 24921934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of spatial separation and noise type on sentence recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Liu YW; Tao DD; Jiang Y; GalvinIII JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan YS; Chen B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 137(8):829-836. PubMed ID: 28296522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spoken word recognition in noise in Mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Ren C; Yang J; Zha D; Lin Y; Liu H; Kong Y; Liu S; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 113():124-130. PubMed ID: 30173970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of voice quality and multi-talker babble noise on sentence processing and recall performance in school children using cochlear implant and/or hearing aids.
    Jonas Brännström K; von Lochow H; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Sahlén B
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Jul; 44(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 30204510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Within-Talker Variability on Speech Intelligibility in Mandarin-Speaking Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Patients.
    Su Q; Galvin JJ; Zhang G; Li Y; Fu QJ
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27363714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.