35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32007225)
21. Tissue modulus calculated from beam theory is biased by bone size and geometry: implications for the use of three-point bending tests to determine bone tissue modulus.
van Lenthe GH; Voide R; Boyd SK; Müller R
Bone; 2008 Oct; 43(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 18639658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comprehensively characterizing heterogeneous and transversely isotropic properties of femur cortical bones.
Zhang G; Jia X; Li Z; Wang Q; Gu H; Liu Y; Bai Z; Mao H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Mar; 151():106387. PubMed ID: 38246092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is the 0.2%-Strain-Offset Approach Appropriate for Calculating the Yield Stress of Cortical Bone?
Zhang G; Luo J; Zheng G; Bai Z; Cao L; Mao H
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Jul; 49(7):1747-1760. PubMed ID: 33479788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improved prediction of rat cortical bone mechanical behavior using composite beam theory to integrate tissue level properties.
Kim G; Boskey AL; Baker SP; van der Meulen MC
J Biomech; 2012 Nov; 45(16):2784-90. PubMed ID: 23021607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MicroCT-based finite element models as a tool for virtual testing of cortical bone.
Ramezanzadehkoldeh M; Skallerud BH
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():12-20. PubMed ID: 28528791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of beam theory for estimating bone tissue modulus and yield stress from 3-point bending tests on rat femora.
Arias-Moreno AJ; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 101():109654. PubMed ID: 32007225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Young's modulus of trabecular bone at the tissue level: A review.
Wu D; Isaksson P; Ferguson SJ; Persson C
Acta Biomater; 2018 Sep; 78():1-12. PubMed ID: 30081232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modelling the Size Effects on the Mechanical Properties of Micro/Nano Structures.
Abazari AM; Safavi SM; Rezazadeh G; Villanueva LG
Sensors (Basel); 2015 Nov; 15(11):28543-62. PubMed ID: 26569256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [New Search]
