997 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32007505)
1. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples.
Heravi FS; Zakrzewski M; Vickery K; Hu H
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105856. PubMed ID: 32007505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Host Depletion and Extraction Methods for Shotgun Metagenomic Analysis of Bovine Vaginal Samples.
Ong CT; Boe-Hansen G; Ross EM; Blackall PJ; Turni C; Hayes BJ; Tabor AE
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0041221. PubMed ID: 35404108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benchmarking microbial DNA enrichment protocols from human intestinal biopsies.
Marchukov D; Li J; Juillerat P; Misselwitz B; Yilmaz B
Front Genet; 2023; 14():1184473. PubMed ID: 37180976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of six DNA extraction protocols for 16S, ITS and shotgun metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities.
Shaffer JP; Carpenter CS; Martino C; Salido RA; Minich JJ; Bryant M; Sanders K; Schwartz T; Humphrey G; Swafford AD; Knight R
Biotechniques; 2022 Jun; 73(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 35713407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An efficient method for high molecular weight bacterial DNA extraction suitable for shotgun metagenomics from skin swabs.
Serghiou IR; Baker D; Evans R; Dalby MJ; Kiu R; Trampari E; Phillips S; Watt R; Atkinson T; Murphy B; Hall LJ; Webber MA
Microb Genom; 2023 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 37428148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing.
Ranjan R; Rani A; Metwally A; McGee HS; Perkins DL
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Jan; 469(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 26718401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of microbial DNA enrichment tools for metagenomic whole genome sequencing.
Thoendel M; Jeraldo PR; Greenwood-Quaintance KE; Yao JZ; Chia N; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP; Patel R
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Aug; 127():141-145. PubMed ID: 27237775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome.
Yap M; Feehily C; Walsh CJ; Fenelon M; Murphy EF; McAuliffe FM; van Sinderen D; O'Toole PW; O'Sullivan O; Cotter PD
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21665. PubMed ID: 33303873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved yield and accuracy for DNA extraction in microbiome studies with variation in microbial biomass.
Davis A; Kohler C; Alsallaq R; Hayden R; Maron G; Margolis E
Biotechniques; 2019 Jun; 66(6):285-289. PubMed ID: 31124702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Species-level bacterial community profiling of the healthy sinonasal microbiome using Pacific Biosciences sequencing of full-length 16S rRNA genes.
Earl JP; Adappa ND; Krol J; Bhat AS; Balashov S; Ehrlich RL; Palmer JN; Workman AD; Blasetti M; Sen B; Hammond J; Cohen NA; Ehrlich GD; Mell JC
Microbiome; 2018 Oct; 6(1):190. PubMed ID: 30352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microbial resolution of whole genome shotgun and 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing using publicly available NEON data.
Brumfield KD; Huq A; Colwell RR; Olds JL; Leddy MB
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228899. PubMed ID: 32053657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Signatures within the esophageal microbiome are associated with host genetics, age, and disease.
Deshpande NP; Riordan SM; Castaño-Rodríguez N; Wilkins MR; Kaakoush NO
Microbiome; 2018 Dec; 6(1):227. PubMed ID: 30558669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multi-amplicon 16S rRNA sequencing and analysis method for improved taxonomic profiling of bacterial communities.
Schriefer AE; Cliften PF; Hibberd MC; Sawyer C; Brown-Kennerly V; Burcea L; Klotz E; Crosby SD; Gordon JI; Head RD
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():6-13. PubMed ID: 30273610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can molecular DNA-based techniques unravel the truth about diabetic foot infections?
Malone M; Gosbell IB; Dickson HG; Vickery K; Espedido BA; Jensen SO
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2017 Jan; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 27291330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved DNA Extraction and Amplification Strategy for 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon-Based Microbiome Studies.
Hong BY; Driscoll M; Gratalo D; Jarvie T; Weinstock GM
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Mar; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 38474213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing Contamination and Diverse Bacterial Loads in 16S rRNA Deep Sequencing of Clinical Samples: Implications of the Law of Small Numbers.
Dyrhovden R; Rippin M; Øvrebø KK; Nygaard RM; Ulvestad E; Kommedal Ø
mBio; 2021 Jun; 12(3):e0059821. PubMed ID: 34101489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-resolution ISR amplicon sequencing reveals personalized oral microbiome.
Mukherjee C; Beall CJ; Griffen AL; Leys EJ
Microbiome; 2018 Sep; 6(1):153. PubMed ID: 30185233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
