164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32007674)
1. The double-swab technique versus single swabs for human DNA recovery from various surfaces.
Hedman J; Jansson L; Akel Y; Wallmark N; Gutierrez Liljestrand R; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102253. PubMed ID: 32007674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of swab material on microbial surface sampling.
Jansson L; Akel Y; Eriksson R; Lavander M; Hedman J
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Sep; 176():106006. PubMed ID: 32721418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
Baechler S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of swabbing technique and duration on forensic DNA recovery.
Abdullah A; Szkuta B; Meakin GE
Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):343-348. PubMed ID: 37169459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces.
Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Jun; 17(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 33180274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the M-Vac
McLamb JM; Adams LD; Kavlick MF
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1828-1834. PubMed ID: 32687222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An improved method to recover saliva from human skin: the double swab technique.
Sweet D; Lorente M; Lorente JA; Valenzuela A; Villanueva E
J Forensic Sci; 1997 Mar; 42(2):320-2. PubMed ID: 9068193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis.
Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I
J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A foldable cardboard box for drying and storage of by cotton swab collected biological samples].
Hochmeister M; Rudin O; Meier R; Peccioli M; Borer U; Eisenberg A; Nagy R; Dirnhofer R
Arch Kriminol; 1997; 200(3-4):113-20. PubMed ID: 9446522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces.
Bonsu DOM; Rodie M; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Dec; 17(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 34674113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
