These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32008343)
1. Histogram analysis in prostate cancer: a comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging model versus monoexponential model. Jiang Y; Li C; Liu Y; Shi K; Zhang W; Liu M; Chen M Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 32008343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer. Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Histogram Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Kurtosis Model in the Diagnosis and Grading of Prostate Cancer-A Preliminary Study. Li C; Yu L; Jiang Y; Cui Y; Liu Y; Shi K; Hou H; Liu M; Zhang W; Zhang J; Zhang C; Chen M Front Oncol; 2021; 11():604428. PubMed ID: 34778020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparisons of the histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion and monoexponential model with in-bore MR-guided biopsy as pathological reference. Cui Y; Li C; Liu Y; Jiang Y; Yu L; Liu M; Zhang W; Shi K; Zhang C; Zhang J; Chen M Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Oct; 45(10):3265-3277. PubMed ID: 31549212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology. Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histogram analysis of breast diffusion kurtosis imaging: a comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence. Huang C; Zhan C; Hu Y; Yin T; Grimm R; Ai T Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Feb; 13(2):735-746. PubMed ID: 36819265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer. Wang Q; Li H; Yan X; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB; Zhang YD Urol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):337.e15-24. PubMed ID: 26048104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer. Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference. Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Discussion of correlation between histogram analysis of quantitative diffusion weighted imaging and Gleason score of prostate cancer]. Wen R; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Shen JK Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 99(11):823-828. PubMed ID: 30893724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-small cell lung cancer: Whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient for assessment of tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion and pleural invasion. Tsuchiya N; Doai M; Usuda K; Uramoto H; Tonami H PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172433. PubMed ID: 28207858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiation of additional suspicious lesions on preoperative breast MRI of patients with known breast cancer. Park VY; Kim SG; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim MJ Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():199-208. PubMed ID: 31323316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Helps to Predict Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With a Gleason Score of 6. Wu CJ; Zhang YD; Bao ML; Li H; Wang XN; Liu XS; Shi HB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1081-1087. PubMed ID: 28834443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population. Barrett T; McLean M; Priest AN; Lawrence EM; Patterson AJ; Koo BC; Patterson I; Warren AY; Doble A; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Gallagher FA Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3141-3150. PubMed ID: 29222677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Discriminating Between Benign Tissue, Low and High Gleason Grade Prostate Cancer. Di Trani MG; Nezzo M; Caporale AS; De Feo R; Miano R; Mauriello A; Bove P; Manenti G; Capuani S Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1328-1337. PubMed ID: 30545680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging. Chen T; Li Y; Lu SS; Zhang YD; Wang XN; Luo CY; Shi HB Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histogram analysis of stretched-exponential and monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging models for distinguishing low and intermediate/high gleason scores in prostate carcinoma. Liu W; Liu XH; Tang W; Gao HB; Zhou BN; Zhou LP J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):491-498. PubMed ID: 29412492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters and mono-exponential ADC for determination of clinically significant cancer in patients with prostate cancer. Park H; Kim SH; Lee Y; Son JH Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4235-4243. PubMed ID: 32965517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Donati OF; Mazaheri Y; Afaq A; Vargas HA; Zheng J; Moskowitz CS; Hricak H; Akin O Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 24475824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Performance of Monoexponential DWI Versus Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Si Y; Liu RB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):358-368. PubMed ID: 29812977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]