These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32008444)

  • 21. Glyphosate-resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations.
    Dill GM; Cajacob CA; Padgette SR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2008 Apr; 64(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 18078304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The global income and production effects of genetically modified (GM) crops 1996-2011.
    Brookes G; Barfoot P
    GM Crops Food; 2013; 4(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 23549349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Economic and herbicide use impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops.
    Gianessi LP
    Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Mar; 61(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15706602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996-2015.
    Brookes G; Barfoot P
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jul; 8(3):156-193. PubMed ID: 28481684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Economic impact of GM crops: the global income and production effects 1996-2012.
    Brookes G; Barfoot P
    GM Crops Food; 2014; 5(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 24637520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Global impact of biotech crops: environmental effects 1996-2009.
    Brookes G; Barfoot P
    GM Crops; 2011; 2(1):34-49. PubMed ID: 21844697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The value of insect management to US maize, soybean and cotton farmers.
    Hurley TM; Mitchell PD
    Pest Manag Sci; 2020 Dec; 76(12):4159-4172. PubMed ID: 32597004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Global impact of biotech crops: environmental effects, 1996-2010.
    Brookes G; Barfoot P
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 22534352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Plant characterization of genetically modified maize hybrids MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3, MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6, and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6: alternatives for maize production in Mexico.
    Heredia Díaz O; Aldaba Meza JL; Baltazar BM; Bojórquez Bojórquez G; Castro Espinoza L; Corrales Madrid JL; de la Fuente Martínez JM; Durán Pompa HA; Alonso Escobedo J; Espinoza Banda A; Garzón Tiznado JA; González García J; Guzmán Rodríguez JL; Madueño Martínez JI; Martínez Carrillo JL; Meng C; Quiñones Pando FJ; Rosales Robles E; Ruiz Hernández I; Treviño Ramírez JE; Uribe Montes HR; Zavala García F
    Transgenic Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):135-151. PubMed ID: 27771867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Global income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996-2014.
    Brookes G; Barfoot P
    GM Crops Food; 2016 Jan; 7(1):38-77. PubMed ID: 27116697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The economic and environmental cost of delayed GM crop adoption: The case of Australia's GM canola moratorium.
    Biden S; Smyth SJ; Hudson D
    GM Crops Food; 2018 Jan; 9(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 29359993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perspectives on transgenic, herbicide-resistant crops in the United States almost 20 years after introduction.
    Duke SO
    Pest Manag Sci; 2015 May; 71(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 25052888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing environmental impact of genetically modified seeds in Brazilian agriculture.
    Seixas RNL; da Silveira JMFJ; Ferrari VE
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():977793. PubMed ID: 36110325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genetically modified cotton in India and detection strategies.
    Randhawa GJ; Chhabra R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 958():17-28. PubMed ID: 23143480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative environmental impact assessment of herbicides used on genetically modified and non-genetically modified herbicide-tolerant canola crops using two risk indicators.
    Oliver DP; Kookana RS; Miller RB; Correll RL
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jul; 557-558():754-63. PubMed ID: 27039064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops.
    Klümper W; Qaim M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111629. PubMed ID: 25365303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect on soil chemistry of genetically modified (GM) vs. non-GM maize.
    Liu N; Zhu P; Peng C; Kang L; Gao H; Clarke NJ; Clarke JL
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 21844670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Capitalizing on deliberate, accidental, and GM-driven environmental change caused by crop modification.
    Knox OG; Walker RL; Booth EJ; Hall C; Crossan AN; Gupta VV
    J Exp Bot; 2012 Jan; 63(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 22090440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trends in pesticide use on soybean, corn and cotton since the introduction of major genetically modified crops in the United States.
    Coupe RH; Capel PD
    Pest Manag Sci; 2016 May; 72(5):1013-22. PubMed ID: 26194175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Field trial of insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for environmental risk assessment in Japan.
    Asanuma Y; Gondo T; Ishigaki G; Inoue K; Zaita N; Muguerza M; Akashi R
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Apr; 8(2):106-116. PubMed ID: 28510512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.