These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32008512)

  • 1. Determining the Accuracy of the Mandibular Canal Region in 3D Biomodels Fabricated from CBCT Scanned Data: A Cadaveric Study.
    Abd Fattah SYAS; Hariri F; Nambiar P; Abu Bakar Z; Abdul Rahman ZA
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(7):645-653. PubMed ID: 32008512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study.
    Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Yüksel SP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
    Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro-computed tomographic imaging.
    Paes da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM; Rice D; Ordinola-Zapata R; Alvares Capelozza AL; Bramante CM; Jaramillo D; Christensen H
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24331989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography.
    Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Borstlap WA; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):793-7. PubMed ID: 22469137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on multi-slice and cone beam computed tomography scans to detect the mandibular canal during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.
    Freire-Maia B; Machado VD; Valerio CS; Custódio AL; Manzi FR; Junqueira JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 46(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 27939592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
    Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
    J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Availability of Software-Based Correction of Mandibular Plane for the Vertical Measurement of the Mandible in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Han SS; Lee KM; Kim KD
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():808625. PubMed ID: 26579540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro correlation of the level of inferior alveolar canal with CBCT imaging.
    Balasundaram A; Heir GM; Villegas FP; Ahmad M; Taher F
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2015 Aug; 37(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 25470980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of assessing the mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography: a validation study.
    Gerlach NL; Ghaeminia H; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):666-71. PubMed ID: 24480773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Oliveira-Santos C; Capelozza AL; Dezzoti MS; Fischer CM; Poleti ML; Rubira-Bullen IR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 21625740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of segmentation of tooth structures using 3 different CBCT machines.
    Shaheen E; Khalil W; Ezeldeen M; Van de Casteele E; Sun Y; Politis C; Jacobs R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Jan; 123(1):123-128. PubMed ID: 27938942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
    Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional error of three-dimensional images generated by different software.
    Pimentel PA; Bomfim RT; Andrade LC; Ferraz EG; Ribeiro Lamberti PL; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
    J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(8):480-4. PubMed ID: 26200519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tracking of the inferior alveolar nerve: its implication in surgical planning.
    Agbaje JO; de Casteele EV; Salem AS; Anumendem D; Lambrichts I; Politis C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2213-2220. PubMed ID: 27878463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study.
    Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Pagin O; Moretti MR; Rubira-Bullen IR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 25963719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations.
    Tomasi C; Bressan E; Corazza B; Mazzoleni S; Stellini E; Lith A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 May; 40(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 21493881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new, highly precise measurement technology for the in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of digital imaging data.
    von Wilmowsky C; Bergauer B; Nkenke E; Neukam FW; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Keller A; Eitner S; Matta RE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1335-9. PubMed ID: 26189144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmentation process significantly influences the accuracy of 3D surface models derived from cone beam computed tomography.
    Fourie Z; Damstra J; Schepers RH; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e524-30. PubMed ID: 21733649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.