139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32009779)
1. PostSV: A Post-Processing Approach for Filtering Structural Variations.
Alzaid E; Allali AE
Bioinform Biol Insights; 2020; 14():1177932219892957. PubMed ID: 32009779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structural variation detection using next-generation sequencing data: A comparative technical review.
Guan P; Sung WK
Methods; 2016 Jun; 102():36-49. PubMed ID: 26845461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CLOVE: classification of genomic fusions into structural variation events.
Schröder J; Wirawan A; Schmidt B; Papenfuss AT
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):346. PubMed ID: 28728542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of multiple algorithms to reliably detect structural variants in pears.
Liu Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Chang W; Sun M; Zhang S; Wu J
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):61. PubMed ID: 31959124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated filtering of genome-wide large deletions through an ensemble deep learning framework.
Hu Y; Mangal S; Zhang L; Zhou X
Methods; 2022 Oct; 206():77-86. PubMed ID: 36038049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of computational genotyping of structural variation for clinical diagnoses.
Chander V; Gibbs RA; Sedlazeck FJ
Gigascience; 2019 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 31494671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robust and exact structural variation detection with paired-end and soft-clipped alignments: SoftSV compared with eight algorithms.
Bartenhagen C; Dugas M
Brief Bioinform; 2016 Jan; 17(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 25998133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic evaluation of multiple NGS platforms for structural variants detection.
Meng X; Wang M; Luo M; Sun L; Yan Q; Liu Y
J Biol Chem; 2023 Dec; 299(12):105436. PubMed ID: 37944616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HySA: a Hybrid Structural variant Assembly approach using next-generation and single-molecule sequencing technologies.
Fan X; Chaisson M; Nakhleh L; Chen K
Genome Res; 2017 May; 27(5):793-800. PubMed ID: 28104618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SV-AUTOPILOT: optimized, automated construction of structural variation discovery and benchmarking pipelines.
Leung WY; Marschall T; Paudel Y; Falquet L; Mei H; Schönhuth A; Maoz Moss TY
BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):238. PubMed ID: 25887570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PanSVR: Pan-Genome Augmented Short Read Realignment for Sensitive Detection of Structural Variations.
Li G; Jiang T; Li J; Wang Y
Front Genet; 2021; 12():731515. PubMed ID: 34490049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CNNdel: Calling Structural Variations on Low Coverage Data Based on Convolutional Neural Networks.
Wang J; Ling C; Gao J
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():6375059. PubMed ID: 28630866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of somatic structural variants from short-read next-generation sequencing data.
Gong T; Hayes VM; Chan EKF
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32379294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ClipSV: improving structural variation detection by read extension, spliced alignment and tree-based decision rules.
Xu P; Chen Y; Gao M; Chong Z
NAR Genom Bioinform; 2021 Mar; 3(1):lqab003. PubMed ID: 33554118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structural variation discovery in the cancer genome using next generation sequencing: computational solutions and perspectives.
Liu B; Conroy JM; Morrison CD; Odunsi AO; Qin M; Wei L; Trump DL; Johnson CS; Liu S; Wang J
Oncotarget; 2015 Mar; 6(8):5477-89. PubMed ID: 25849937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benchmarking long-read aligners and SV callers for structural variation detection in Oxford nanopore sequencing data.
Helal AA; Saad BT; Saad MT; Mosaad GS; Aboshanab KM
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6160. PubMed ID: 38486064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of mosaic and population-level structural variants with Sniffles2.
Smolka M; Paulin LF; Grochowski CM; Horner DW; Mahmoud M; Behera S; Kalef-Ezra E; Gandhi M; Hong K; Pehlivan D; Scholz SW; Carvalho CMB; Proukakis C; Sedlazeck FJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38168980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SV-STAT accurately detects structural variation via alignment to reference-based assemblies.
Davis CF; Ritter DI; Wheeler DA; Wang H; Ding Y; Dugan SP; Bainbridge MN; Muzny DM; Rao PH; Man TK; Plon SE; Gibbs RA; Lau CC
Source Code Biol Med; 2016; 11():8. PubMed ID: 27330550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
