BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32011819)

  • 1. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
    Chandarana M; Harries S;
    BJS Open; 2020 Feb; 4(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 32011819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre.
    Barber MD; Williams L; Anderson ED; Neades GT; Raine C; Young O; Kulkarni D; Young I; Dixon JM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 25238954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
    Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early Functional Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Matched Cohort Study.
    Schaeffer CV; Dassoulas KR; Thuman J; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S399-S403. PubMed ID: 30570559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for complications and implant loss after prepectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: medium-term outcomes in a prospective cohort.
    Dave RV; Vucicevic A; Barrett E; Highton L; Johnson R; Kirwan CC; Harvey JR; Murphy J
    Br J Surg; 2021 May; 108(5):534-541. PubMed ID: 34043774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
    Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
    Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix.
    Pires G; Marquez JL; Memmott S; Sudduth JD; Moss W; Eddington D; Hobson G; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 37285211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience with 201 Consecutive Patients.
    Safran T; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr; 145(4):686e-696e. PubMed ID: 32221195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A retrospective comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in direct-to-implant and two-stages prepectoral breast reconstruction: BMI and radiotherapy as new selection criteria of patients.
    Casella D; Di Taranto G; Onesti MG; Greco M; Ribuffo D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1357-1363. PubMed ID: 30827802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Broad Application of Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix Drape and Fluorescent Imaging in a Community Setting.
    Bilezikian JA; Tenzel PL; Bebb GG; Kays CR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 31985606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of the Surgical Technique for "Breast in a Day" Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Transitioning from Dual-Plane to Prepectoral Implant Placement.
    Antony AK; Poirier J; Madrigrano A; Kopkash KA; Robinson EC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun; 143(6):1547-1556. PubMed ID: 31136464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications.
    Tasoulis MK; Teoh V; Khan A; Montgomery C; Mohammed K; Gui G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):511-515. PubMed ID: 31706716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-Plane versus Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in High-Body Mass Index Patients.
    Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Storm-Dickerson TL; Sigalove NM; Pope N; Rice J; Maxwell GP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jun; 145(6):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 32195862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
    Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.
    Potter S; Chambers A; Govindajulu S; Sahu A; Warr R; Cawthorn S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 24011501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
    Dyrberg DL; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
    Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 32041661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.