These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32012063)

  • 1. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data.
    Bidmon S; Elshiewy O; Terlutter R; Boztug Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13830. PubMed ID: 32012063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
    Emmert M; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18374. PubMed ID: 32687479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Sep; 21(9):e14336. PubMed ID: 31573918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Reimann S
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e299. PubMed ID: 28842391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website.
    Emmert M; McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e24229. PubMed ID: 34309579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Kahrass H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):670. PubMed ID: 30157842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?
    Hageman MG; Ring DC; Gregory PJ; Rubash HE; Harmon L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 May; 473(5):1590-7. PubMed ID: 25287521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire.
    Bidmon S; Terlutter R; Röttl J
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jun; 16(6):e148. PubMed ID: 24918859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Internal Patient Satisfaction Scores at a Cancer Center With Star Ratings on Online Physician-Rating Websites.
    Kim C; Chisholm G; Bevolo A; Shelton B; Kian L; Lewis CM; Garcia EA; Weber RS; Frumovitz M
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1181-e1188. PubMed ID: 33760627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.
    Terlutter R; Bidmon S; Röttl J
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Mar; 16(3):e97. PubMed ID: 24686918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians' and Health Care Consumers' Perspectives.
    Rothenfluh F; Schulz PJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e127. PubMed ID: 28461285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?
    Rothenfluh F; Germeni E; Schulz PJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e129. PubMed ID: 27311623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
    Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
    Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period.
    Emmert M; Sauter L; Jablonski L; Sander U; Taheri-Zadeh F
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e275. PubMed ID: 28747292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
    Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review.
    Emmert M; Sander U; Pisch F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Feb; 15(2):e24. PubMed ID: 23372115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.