178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32012855)
1. Comparison of Ilizarov Bifocal, Acute Shortening and Relengthening with Bone Transport in the Treatment of Infected, Segmental Defects of the Tibia.
Sigmund IK; Ferguson J; Govaert GAM; Stubbs D; McNally MA
J Clin Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 32012855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ilizarov segmental bone transport of infected tibial nonunions requiring extensive debridement with an average distraction length of 9,5 centimetres. Is it safe?
Kinik H; Kalem M
Injury; 2021 Aug; 52(8):2425-2433. PubMed ID: 31883864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute shortening and re-lengthening versus antibiotic calcium sulfate-loaded bone transport for the management of large segmental tibial defects after trauma.
Huang Q; Xu Y; Lu Y; Ren C; Liu L; Li M; Wang Q; Li Z; Xue H; Zhang K; Ma T
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 17(1):219. PubMed ID: 35399099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acute shortening and double-level lengthening versus bone transport for the management of large tibial bone defects after trauma and infection.
Huang Q; Ma T; Xu Y; Lu Y; Li M; Wang Q; Ren C; Xue H; Li Z; Zhang K
Injury; 2023 Mar; 54(3):983-990. PubMed ID: 36658026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bifocal or Trifocal (Double-Level) Bone Transport Using Unilateral Rail System in the Treatment of Large Tibial Defects Caused by Infection: A Retrospective Study.
Yushan M; Ren P; Abula A; Alike Y; Abulaiti A; Ma C; Yusufu A
Orthop Surg; 2020 Feb; 12(1):184-193. PubMed ID: 31943836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone transport versus acute shortening for the management of infected tibial non-unions with bone defects.
Tetsworth K; Paley D; Sen C; Jaffe M; Maar DC; Glatt V; Hohmann E; Herzenberg JE
Injury; 2017 Oct; 48(10):2276-2284. PubMed ID: 28734494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Matched comparative study of trifocal bone transport versus induced membrane followed by trifocal bone transport in the treatment of segmental tibial defects caused by posttraumatic osteomyelitis.
Hamiti Y; Yushan M; Yalikun A; Lu C; Yusufu A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jun; 23(1):572. PubMed ID: 35701789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bifocal compression-distraction in the acute treatment of grade III open tibia fractures with bone and soft-tissue loss: a report of 24 cases.
Sen C; Kocaoglu M; Eralp L; Gulsen M; Cinar M
J Orthop Trauma; 2004 Mar; 18(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 15091269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstruction of massive tibial bone and soft tissue defects by trifocal bone transport combined with soft tissue distraction: experience from 31 cases.
Xu YQ; Fan XY; He XQ; Wen HJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jan; 22(1):34. PubMed ID: 33413256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy comparison of double-level and single-level bone transport with Orthofix fixator for treatment of tibia fracture with massive bone defects.
Li Y; Shen S; Xiao Q; Wang G; Yang H; Zhao H; Shu B; Zhuo N
Int Orthop; 2020 May; 44(5):957-963. PubMed ID: 32114659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tetrafocal (three osteotomies) and pentafocal (four osteotomies) bone transport using Ilizarov technique in the treatment of distal tibial defect-preliminary outcomes of 12 cases and a description of the surgical technique.
Yushan M; Abulaiti A; Maimaiti X; Hamiti Y; Yusufu A
Injury; 2022 Aug; 53(8):2880-2887. PubMed ID: 35691766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone Defects in Tibia Managed by the Bifocal vs. Trifocal Bone Transport Technique: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
Abulaiti A; Liu Y; Cai F; Liu K; Abula A; Maimaiti X; Ren P; Yusufu A
Front Surg; 2022; 9():858240. PubMed ID: 36034365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bifocal Compression-Distraction for Combined Bone and Soft-Tissue Defects in Post-traumatic Tibial Nonunion.
Thakeb MF; Fayyad TA; ElGebeily MA; Diab RA; El Zahlawy H; Sharafeldin MS; Al Kersh MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Oct; 33(10):e372-e377. PubMed ID: 31469753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of locked plates and mono-rail fixator in segmental tibial defects: A prospective interventional study.
Kunwar BB; Maheshwari V; Dhingra M; Bhagat S; Pv C; Vardhan S
J Orthop; 2023 Oct; 44():47-52. PubMed ID: 37664557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Docking site complications analysis of Ilizarov bone transport technique in the treatment of tibial bone defects.
Feng D; Zhang Y; Wu W; Jia H; Ma C
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Nov; 18(1):889. PubMed ID: 37993906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children.
Abdelkhalek M; El-Alfy B; Ali AM
J Pediatr Orthop B; 2016 Nov; 25(6):556-60. PubMed ID: 27243804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone Transport for Treatment of Traumatic Composite Tibial Bone and Soft Tissue Defects: Any Specific Needs besides the Ilizarov Technique?
Li R; Zhu G; Chen C; Chen Y; Ren G
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2716547. PubMed ID: 32185197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ilizarov Treatment Protocols in the Management of Infected Nonunion of the Tibia.
McNally M; Ferguson J; Kugan R; Stubbs D
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Oct; 31 Suppl 5():S47-S54. PubMed ID: 28938393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects and Bone Loss in the Tibia by Flap Transfer and Bone Transport by Distraction Osteogenesis: A Case Series and Our Experience.
Abula A; Yushan M; Ren P; Abulaiti A; Ma C; Yusufu A
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 May; 84(5S Suppl 3):S202-S207. PubMed ID: 32282415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acute shortening versus bone transport for the treatment of infected femur non-unions with bone defects.
Sen C; Demirel M; Sağlam Y; Balcı HI; Eralp L; Kocaoğlu M
Injury; 2019 Nov; 50(11):2075-2083. PubMed ID: 31447211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
