These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32013584)

  • 1. The Quality of Assessment of Learning (Qual) Score: Validity Evidence for a Scoring System Aimed at Rating Short, Workplace-Based Comments on Trainee Performance.
    Chan TM; Sebok-Syer SS; Sampson C; Monteiro S
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):319-329. PubMed ID: 32013584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Quality of Assessment for Learning score for evaluating written feedback in anesthesiology postgraduate medical education: a generalizability and decision study.
    Choo EK; Woods R; Walker ME; O'Brien JM; Chan TM
    Can Med Educ J; 2023 Dec; 14(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 38226296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Natural Language Processing to Evaluate the Quality of Supervisor Narrative Comments in Competency-Based Medical Education.
    Spadafore M; Yilmaz Y; Rally V; Chan TM; Russell M; Thoma B; Singh S; Monteiro S; Pardhan A; Martin L; Monrad SU; Woods R
    Acad Med; 2024 May; 99(5):534-540. PubMed ID: 38232079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity evidence for the Quality of Assessment for Learning score: a quality metric for supervisor comments in Competency Based Medical Education.
    Woods R; Singh S; Thoma B; Patocka C; Cheung W; Monteiro S; Chan TM;
    Can Med Educ J; 2022 Nov; 13(6):19-35. PubMed ID: 36440075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality in-training evaluation reports--does feedback drive faculty performance?
    Dudek NL; Marks MB; Bandiera G; White J; Wood TJ
    Acad Med; 2013 Aug; 88(8):1129-34. PubMed ID: 23807095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring gender influences in the quality of workplace-based assessments.
    Ingratta J; Dudek N; Lacroix L; Cortel-LeBlanc M; McConnell M; Cheung WJ
    CJEM; 2023 Jun; 25(6):475-480. PubMed ID: 37166679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-training evaluations: developing an automated screening tool to measure report quality.
    Bismil R; Dudek NL; Wood TJ
    Med Educ; 2014 Jul; 48(7):724-32. PubMed ID: 24909534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initial performance of a modified milestones global evaluation tool for semiannual evaluation of residents by faculty.
    Borman KR; Augustine R; Leibrandt T; Pezzi CM; Kukora JS
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(6):739-49. PubMed ID: 24209650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT) to the traditional daily encounter card: measuring the quality of documented assessments.
    Endres K; Dudek N; McConnell M; Cheung WJ
    CJEM; 2021 May; 23(3):383-389. PubMed ID: 33512695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supervisor-trainee continuity and the quality of work-based assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek NL; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    Med Educ; 2017 Dec; 51(12):1260-1268. PubMed ID: 28971502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does faculty development influence the quality of in-training evaluation reports in pharmacy?
    Wilbur K
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):222. PubMed ID: 29157239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is time really of the essence? Timeliness of narrative feedback in ophthalmology CBME assessments.
    Hanmore T; Moon CC; Curtis R; Hopman W; Baxter S
    Med Teach; 2024 May; 46(5):705-710. PubMed ID: 37910021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How faculty members experience workplace-based assessment rater training: a qualitative study.
    Kogan JR; Conforti LN; Bernabeo E; Iobst W; Holmboe E
    Med Educ; 2015 Jul; 49(7):692-708. PubMed ID: 26077217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does direct observation influence the quality of workplace-based assessment documentation?
    Landreville JM; Wood TJ; Frank JR; Cheung WJ
    AEM Educ Train; 2022 Aug; 6(4):e10781. PubMed ID: 35903424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Daily Encounter Cards-Evaluating the Quality of Documented Assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek N; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 8(4):601-604. PubMed ID: 27777675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The McMaster Narrative Comment Rating Tool: Development and Initial Validity Evidence.
    McGuire N; Acai A; Sonnadara RR
    Teach Learn Med; 2023 Nov; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 37964518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Reliable are Single-Question Workplace-Based Assessments in Surgery?
    Gates RS; Krumm AE; Cate OT; Chen X; Marcotte K; Thelen AE; Deal SB; Alseidi A; Swanson D; George BC
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Jul; 81(7):967-972. PubMed ID: 38816336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Impact of Electronic Data to Capture Qualitative Comments in a Competency-Based Assessment System.
    Chan TM; Sebok-Syer SS; Yilmaz Y; Monteiro S
    Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23480. PubMed ID: 35494923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity evidence for Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R) scores: consequences of rater number and type using neurology cases.
    Kassardjian C; Park YS; Braksick S; Cutsforth-Gregory J; Robertson C; Young N; Leep Hunderfund A
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 Nov; 28(11):925-933. PubMed ID: 30996038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability, validity, and feasibility of the Zwisch scale for the assessment of intraoperative performance.
    George BC; Teitelbaum EN; Meyerson SL; Schuller MC; DaRosa DA; Petrusa ER; Petito LC; Fryer JP
    J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):e90-6. PubMed ID: 25192794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.