164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32013960)
1. Development of a risk-stratification scoring system for predicting lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer.
Ni-Jia-Ti MY; Ai-Hai-Ti DL; Huo-Jia AS; Wu-Mai-Er PL; A-Bu-Li-Zi AB; Shi Y; Rou-Zi NE; Su WJ; Dai GZ; Da-Mo-la MH
BMC Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):94. PubMed ID: 32013960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI-based radiomics.
Liu Z; Feng B; Li C; Chen Y; Chen Q; Li X; Guan J; Chen X; Cui E; Li R; Li Z; Long W
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):847-857. PubMed ID: 30773770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peritumoral apparent diffusion coefficients for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer.
Mori N; Mugikura S; Takasawa C; Miyashita M; Shimauchi A; Ota H; Ishida T; kasajima A; Takase K; Kodama T; Takahashi S
Eur Radiol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 26024846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast MRI for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes.
Igarashi T; Furube H; Ashida H; Ojiri H
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():111-118. PubMed ID: 30292254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Machine Learning Methods to Assess Lymphovascular Invasion and Survival in Breast Cancer: Performance of Combining Preoperative Clinical and MRI Characteristics.
Xu Z; Xie Y; Wu L; Chen M; Shi Z; Cui Y; Han C; Lin H; Liu Y; Li P; Chen X; Ding Y; Liu Z
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Nov; 58(5):1580-1589. PubMed ID: 36797654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting lymphovascular invasion in invasive cervical cancer.
Yang W; Qiang JW; Tian HP; Chen B; Wang AJ; Zhao JG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1771-1779. PubMed ID: 27859961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative MRI features associated with lymphovascular invasion in node-negative invasive breast cancer: A propensity-matched analysis.
Cheon H; Kim HJ; Lee SM; Cho SH; Shin KM; Kim GC; Park JY; Kim WH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28370761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in T1-2 invasive breast cancer with 1-2 axillary sentinel lymph node metastases: Presentation of Ondokuz Mayis scoring system.
Kuru B; Sullu Y; Yuruker S; Koray Bayrak I; Ozen N
J BUON; 2016; 21(5):1129-1136. PubMed ID: 27837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.
Durando M; Gennaro L; Cho GY; Giri DD; Gnanasigamani MM; Patil S; Sutton EJ; Deasy JO; Morris EA; Thakur SB
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1651-8. PubMed ID: 27501902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI and diffusion-weighted image as predictors of lymphovascular invasion in node-negative invasive breast cancer.
Choi BB
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 19(1):76. PubMed ID: 33722246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors of lymph node metastasis or lymphovascular invasion for early gastric cancer: a practical and effective predictive model based on international multicenter data.
Lin JX; Wang ZK; Wang W; Desiderio J; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lu J; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Zheng CH; Li P; Parisi A; Zhou ZW; Huang CM
BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1048. PubMed ID: 31694573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Value of Nomograms in Pre-Operative Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion in Primary Breast Cancer Undergoing Modified Radical Surgery: Based on Multiparametric Ultrasound and Clinicopathologic Indicators.
Zhou P; Jin C; Lu J; Xu L; Zhu X; Lian Q; Gong X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 47(3):517-526. PubMed ID: 33277109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Performance of Fused Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using T1-Weighted Imaging for Axillary Nodal Staging in Patients With Early Breast Cancer.
Kim SH; Shin HJ; Shin KC; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Apr; 17(2):154-163. PubMed ID: 27843006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative analysis of shear wave elastic heterogeneity for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer.
Huang Y; Liu Y; Wang Y; Zheng X; Han J; Li Q; Hu Y; Mao R; Zhou J
Br J Radiol; 2021 Nov; 94(1127):20210682. PubMed ID: 34478333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI: predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.
Chung J; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Kim EK; Ryu YH; Son EJ
Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 24234236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does lymphovascular invasion predict regional nodal failure in breast cancer patients with zero to three positive lymph nodes treated with conserving surgery and radiotherapy? Implications for regional radiation.
Boutrus R; Abi-Raad R; Niemierko A; Brachtel EF; Rizk L; Kelada A; Taghian AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(3):793-8. PubMed ID: 20171799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of lymphovascular invasion and immunohistochemical expression of IMP3 in the risk stratification of superficially invasive pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Trivedi A; Cartun RW; Ligato S
Pathol Res Pract; 2014 Jul; 210(7):402-6. PubMed ID: 24726263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Nomogram for Predicting the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in Women with T1-3N0-1miM0 Hormone Receptor‒Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)‒Negative Breast Cancer.
Lee SB; Kim J; Sohn G; Kim J; Chung IY; Kim HJ; Ko BS; Son BH; Ahn SH; Lee JW; Jung KH
Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 51(3):1073-1085. PubMed ID: 30384581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of a point-based scoring system for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis and disease outcome in breast cancer using clinicopathological and multiparametric MRI features.
Chen X; Yang Z; Huang R; Li Y; Liao Y; Li G; Wang M; Chen X; Dai Z; Fan W
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):54. PubMed ID: 37264446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can 3.0 Tesla diffusion tensor Imaging parameters be prognostic indicators in breast cancer?
Ozal ST; Inci E; Gemici AA; Turgut H; Cikot M; Karabulut M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 51():240-247. PubMed ID: 29886409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
