134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3201418)
1. [Cytological mass screenings for the cancer of the cervix uteri. Resources, organization and costs].
Kolstad P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1988 Sep; 108(25):2057-60. PubMed ID: 3201418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Organization and efficacy of cytological examinations in the mass screening of women in the Moldavian SSR].
Khonelidze GB; Lazarev IM; Cheban DA; Zavtur LV
Vopr Onkol; 1984; 30(9):91-4. PubMed ID: 6238482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Costs and problems in cervix cancer screening are considerably underestimated].
Bistoletti P
Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3506-8. PubMed ID: 11037597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Economics of screening for cancer of the cervix.
Hicks S; Edwards D
N Z Med J; 1986 Nov; 99(814):916. PubMed ID: 3468422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytological mass screening in Ostfold County, Norway.
Magnus K; Langmark F
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):87-90. PubMed ID: 3570418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Incidence and mortality of uterine cervix cancer in Norway. When do we get organized nation-wide cytologic screening in Norway?].
Magnus K; Langmark F
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May; 110(12):1557-9. PubMed ID: 2187277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic aspects of screening for cervical cancer in New Zealand.
Bethwaite J; Rayner T; Bethwaite P
N Z Med J; 1986 Oct; 99(811):747-51. PubMed ID: 3464889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A reply on cervix cancer screening: cervical cytological test doesn't fulfil the requirements of a good screening test].
Bistoletti P
Lakartidningen; 2000 Sep; 97(37):4042. PubMed ID: 11036367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Recommendations in aberrant findings of cytological studies of the cervix uteri].
Vooijs GP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Sep; 131(38):1662-3. PubMed ID: 3670461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of screening for uterine cervix cancer: from theory to practice (author's transl)].
Riotton G
Bull Cancer; 1979; 66(4):404-6. PubMed ID: 526628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The impending loss of screening for cervix uteri carcinoma in the Netherlands].
Lammes FB
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Apr; 130(15):673-4. PubMed ID: 3703044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for cancer of uterine cervix and approaches adopted in India.
Murthy NS; Mathew A
Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):154-62. PubMed ID: 10921220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [No effect of organized cervix cancer screening].
Zahl PH
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(11):1302; author reply 1302. PubMed ID: 18511980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cytological screening of precancer and cancer of the cervix uteri].
Novik VI
Vopr Onkol; 1990; 36(12):1411-8. PubMed ID: 2288117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France].
Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Prophylaxis and screening of precancer and cancer of the uterine cervix in the XXI century].
Kostova P; Zlatkov V
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2009; 48(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 19496464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cervix cancer screening can be cost-effective. Combination of vaginal smears and the HPV test should be even more beneficial].
Bistoletti P; Ellström A; Dillner J; Sennfält K; Sparén P; Strander B
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jun 13-26; 102(24-25):1874-6, 1878-9. PubMed ID: 16044766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effectiveness of cytological screening during prophylactic examinations of women in detecting precancer and cancer of the cervix uteri--the screening results of 1971-1981 in the People's Republic of Bulgaria].
Tsanev K; Aleksieva A; Manolova Ia; Damianov P; Toshev I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1983; 22(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 6660408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Organization of screening programs in developing countries with reference to screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in India.
Luthra UK; Rengachari R
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):273-88. PubMed ID: 3570411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
