These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32014621)

  • 1. Applying the verifiability approach to deception detection in alibi witness situations.
    Vernham Z; Vrij A; Nahari G; Leal S; Mann S; Satchell L; Orthey R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103020. PubMed ID: 32014621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Lafferty M; Nahari G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():1-8. PubMed ID: 28088655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements.
    Sakrisvold ML; Granhag PA; Mac Giolla E
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 28247431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting lies in children and adults.
    Edelstein RS; Luten TL; Ekman P; Goodman GS
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16729205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introducing the high-context communication style interview protocol to detect deception in pairs.
    Leal S; Vrij A; Ashkenazi T; Vernham Z; Fisher RP; Palena N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Sep; 249():104440. PubMed ID: 39167909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting deception in children: A meta-analysis.
    Gongola J; Scurich N; Quas JA
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 27685642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. You must be lying because I don't understand you: Language proficiency and lie detection.
    Elliott E; Leach AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Dec; 22(4):488-499. PubMed ID: 27936858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ease of lying.
    Verschuere B; Spruyt A; Meijer EH; Otgaar H
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):908-11. PubMed ID: 21093302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some evidence for unconscious lie detection.
    Ten Brinke L; Stimson D; Carney DR
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1098-105. PubMed ID: 24659190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychopathy and deception detection.
    Martin K; Leach AM
    Personal Ment Health; 2013 May; 7(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 24343941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
    Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.
    Langleben DD; Loughead JW; Bilker WB; Ruparel K; Childress AR; Busch SI; Gur RC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16161128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Let the man choose what to do: Neural correlates of spontaneous lying and truth-telling.
    Yin L; Reuter M; Weber B
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Feb; 102():13-25. PubMed ID: 26685089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies.
    Frank MG; Ekman P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 Jun; 72(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 9177024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Altruistic Lying in an Alibi Corroboration Context: The Effects of Liking, Compliance, and Relationship between Suspects and Witnesses.
    Marion SB; Burke TM
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 28008653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-cultural differences in children's choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies.
    Fu G; Xu F; Cameron CA; Leyman G; Lee K
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Mar; 43(2):278-93. PubMed ID: 17352539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context.
    Debey E; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J; Verschuere B
    Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):478-88. PubMed ID: 24923778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
    Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.