162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32015015)
1. Partial ectogenesis: freedom, equality and political perspective.
Romanis EC
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 32015015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gender, gestation and ectogenesis: self-determination for pregnant people ahead of artificial wombs.
Horn C
J Med Ethics; 2020 Nov; 46(11):787-788. PubMed ID: 32366699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective.
Cavaliere G
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 31704782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive technologies are not the cure for social problems.
Campo-Engelstein L
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):85-86. PubMed ID: 31974292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary on 'Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective'.
Cohen IG
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 32015016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial Womb Technology and the Choice to Gestate Ex Utero: Is Partial Ectogenesis the Business of the Criminal Law?
Romanis EC
Med Law Rev; 2020 May; 28(2):342-374. PubMed ID: 31851353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion Rights after Artificial Wombs: Why Decriminalisation is Needed Ahead of Ectogenesis.
Horn C
Med Law Rev; 2021 Aug; 29(1):80-105. PubMed ID: 34370037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pregnant people, inseminators and tissues of human origin: how ectogenesis challenges the concept of abortion.
Kendal E
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2020 Dec; 38(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 33175992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moving forwards: A problem for full ectogenesis.
Baron T
Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):407-413. PubMed ID: 33587328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise.
Simkulet W
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 31537616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Perfect Womb: Promoting Equality of (Fetal) Opportunity.
Kendal E
J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 28224271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Moral Superiority of Bioengineered Wombs and Ectogenesis for Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility.
Kendal E; Koplin JJ
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2022 Jan; 31(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 35049456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ectogenesis, justice and utility: a reply to James.
Wells D
Bioethics; 1987 Oct; 1(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 11651909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective' response to commentaries.
Cavaliere G
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):91-92. PubMed ID: 32015017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Unique benefits of ectogenesis outweigh potential harms.
Kendal E
Emerg Top Life Sci; 2019 Nov; 3(6):719-722. PubMed ID: 32915221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus.
Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
Bioethics; 2019 Jan; 33(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 30341923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjects of ectogenesis: are 'gestatelings' fetuses, newborns or neither?
Colgrove N
J Med Ethics; 2019 Nov; 45(11):723-726. PubMed ID: 31341012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ectogenesis: a reply to Singer and Wells.
James DN
Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):80-99. PubMed ID: 11649763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?
Romanis EC
Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 31782820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges.
Segers S
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 May; 22(1):59. PubMed ID: 33985480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
