135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32015016)
1. Commentary on 'Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective'.
Cohen IG
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 32015016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Partial ectogenesis: freedom, equality and political perspective.
Romanis EC
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 32015015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective.
Cavaliere G
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 31704782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective' response to commentaries.
Cavaliere G
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):91-92. PubMed ID: 32015017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion Rights after Artificial Wombs: Why Decriminalisation is Needed Ahead of Ectogenesis.
Horn C
Med Law Rev; 2021 Aug; 29(1):80-105. PubMed ID: 34370037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gender, gestation and ectogenesis: self-determination for pregnant people ahead of artificial wombs.
Horn C
J Med Ethics; 2020 Nov; 46(11):787-788. PubMed ID: 32366699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ectogenesis and a right to the death of the prenatal human being: A reply to Räsänen.
Kaczor C
Bioethics; 2018 Nov; 32(9):634-638. PubMed ID: 30252944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pregnant people, inseminators and tissues of human origin: how ectogenesis challenges the concept of abortion.
Kendal E
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2020 Dec; 38(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 33175992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial Wombs and Abortion Rights.
Cohen IG
Hastings Cent Rep; 2017 Jul; 47(4):inside back cover. PubMed ID: 28749060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why bother the public? A critique of Leslie Cannold's empirical research on ectogenesis.
Smajdor A
Theor Med Bioeth; 2021 Aug; 42(3-4):155-168. PubMed ID: 34846609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ectogenesis, abortion and a right to the death of the fetus.
Räsänen J
Bioethics; 2017 Nov; 31(9):697-702. PubMed ID: 29044695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial Womb Technology and the Choice to Gestate Ex Utero: Is Partial Ectogenesis the Business of the Criminal Law?
Romanis EC
Med Law Rev; 2020 May; 28(2):342-374. PubMed ID: 31851353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus.
Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
Bioethics; 2019 Jan; 33(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 30341923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women, ectogenesis and ethical theory.
Cannold L
J Appl Philos; 1995; 12(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 12416524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Could artificial wombs end the abortion debate?
Kaczor C
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(2):283-301. PubMed ID: 16170885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. There is no right to the death of the fetus.
Hendricks P
Bioethics; 2018 Jul; 32(6):395-397. PubMed ID: 29883519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Would artificial wombs produce more harm than good?
Davin J; Kaczor C
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(4):657; author reply 658. PubMed ID: 16459368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Procreation machines: Ectogenesis as reproductive enhancement, proper medicine or a step towards posthumanism?
Eichinger J; Eichinger T
Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):385-391. PubMed ID: 31943287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Perfect Womb: Promoting Equality of (Fetal) Opportunity.
Kendal E
J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 28224271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges.
Segers S
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 May; 22(1):59. PubMed ID: 33985480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
