These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32016898)

  • 21. Simulation with quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics for drug discovery.
    Barbault F; Maurel F
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 Oct; 10(10):1047-57. PubMed ID: 26289577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. BRD4: quantum mechanical protein-ligand binding free energies using the full-protein DFT-based QM-PBSA method.
    Gundelach L; Fox T; Tautermann CS; Skylaris CK
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Oct; 24(41):25240-25249. PubMed ID: 36222107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Machine learning-accelerated quantum mechanics-based atomistic simulations for industrial applications.
    Morawietz T; Artrith N
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Apr; 35(4):557-586. PubMed ID: 33034008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Free energy calculations to estimate ligand-binding affinities in structure-based drug design.
    Reddy MR; Reddy CR; Rathore RS; Erion MD; Aparoy P; Reddy RN; Reddanna P
    Curr Pharm Des; 2014; 20(20):3323-37. PubMed ID: 23947646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative assessment of QM-based and MM-based models for prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity trends.
    Maier S; Thapa B; Erickson J; Raghavachari K
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Jun; 24(23):14525-14537. PubMed ID: 35661842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Theoretical modeling of large molecular systems. Advances in the local self consistent field method for mixed quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations.
    Monari A; Rivail JL; Assfeld X
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Feb; 46(2):596-603. PubMed ID: 23249409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computational methods for calculation of ligand-binding affinity.
    de Azevedo WF; Dias R
    Curr Drug Targets; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1031-9. PubMed ID: 19128212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lead optimization via high-throughput molecular docking.
    Joseph-McCarthy D; Baber JC; Feyfant E; Thompson DC; Humblet C
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):264-74. PubMed ID: 17554852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fragment-based quantum mechanical calculation of protein-protein binding affinities.
    Wang Y; Liu J; Li J; He X
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Aug; 39(21):1617-1628. PubMed ID: 29707784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Free energies of binding from large-scale first-principles quantum mechanical calculations: application to ligand hydration energies.
    Fox SJ; Pittock C; Tautermann CS; Fox T; Christ C; Malcolm NO; Essex JW; Skylaris CK
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Aug; 117(32):9478-85. PubMed ID: 23841453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving the accuracy of predicting protein-ligand binding-free energy with semiempirical quantum chemistry charge.
    Peng C; Wang J; Yu Y; Wang G; Chen Z; Xu Z; Cai T; Shao Q; Shi J; Zhu W
    Future Med Chem; 2019 Feb; 11(4):303-321. PubMed ID: 30802139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Advances in binding free energies calculations: QM/MM-based free energy perturbation method for drug design.
    Rathore RS; Sumakanth M; Reddy MS; Reddanna P; Rao AA; Erion MD; Reddy MR
    Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(26):4674-86. PubMed ID: 23260025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Thermodynamics calculation of protein-ligand interactions by QM/MM polarizable charge parameters.
    Wang J; Shao Q; Cossins BP; Shi J; Chen K; Zhu W
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2016; 34(1):163-76. PubMed ID: 25761118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New generation of docking programs: Supercomputer validation of force fields and quantum-chemical methods for docking.
    Sulimov AV; Kutov DC; Katkova EV; Ilin IS; Sulimov VB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Nov; 78():139-147. PubMed ID: 29055806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
    Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.
    Raman EP; Paul TJ; Hayes RL; Brooks CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Dec; 16(12):7895-7914. PubMed ID: 33201701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Towards accurate free energy calculations in ligand protein-binding studies.
    Steinbrecher T; Labahn A
    Curr Med Chem; 2010; 17(8):767-85. PubMed ID: 20088755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New approaches for computing ligand-receptor binding kinetics.
    Bruce NJ; Ganotra GK; Kokh DB; Sadiq SK; Wade RC
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Apr; 49():1-10. PubMed ID: 29132080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accurate Modeling of Scaffold Hopping Transformations in Drug Discovery.
    Wang L; Deng Y; Wu Y; Kim B; LeBard DN; Wandschneider D; Beachy M; Friesner RA; Abel R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 27933808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.