408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32017456)
1. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.
Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Embedded cervical esophagogastrostomy: a simple and convenient method using a circular stapler after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinomas.
Wu S; Chen M; Wei L; Chen Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):2984-90. PubMed ID: 23645482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of cervical delta-shaped anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis after esophagectomy.
Huang C; Xu X; Zhuang B; Chen W; Xu X; Wang C; Lin S
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):31. PubMed ID: 28103879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.
Yanni F; Singh P; Tewari N; Parsons SL; Catton JA; Duffy J; Welch NT; Vohra RS
World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 31222637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi-mechanical with hand-sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE-study).
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; de Vringer T; van Lanschot JJB; Willemsen SP; Hop WCJ; Wijnhoven BPL
J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 122(8):1616-1623. PubMed ID: 32989770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-placement versus placement of a drainage tube around the cervical anastomosis in McKeown esophagectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda Y; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):758. PubMed ID: 31870427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Hayata K; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Ojima T; Iwahashi M; Katsuda M; Tsuji T; Kato T; Kitadani J; Takeuchi A; Tabata H; Yamaue H
Surgery; 2017 Jul; 162(1):131-138. PubMed ID: 28318550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thoracoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy by use of linear stapler-a simplified technique facilitating a minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis operation.
Irino T; Tsai JA; Ericson J; Nilsson M; Lundell L; Rouvelas I
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 May; 401(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 26960591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
