These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32018281)
1. Reduction of an in vitro Intraradicular Multispecies Biofilm Using Two Rotary Instrumentation Sequences. Zavattini A; Cowie J; Niazi S; Giovarruscio M; Sauro S; Foschi F Eur J Dent; 2020 Feb; 14(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 32018281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Torsional Performance of ProTaper Gold Rotary Instruments during Shaping of Small Root Canals after 2 Different Glide Path Preparations. Arias A; de Vasconcelos RA; Hernández A; Peters OA J Endod; 2017 Mar; 43(3):447-451. PubMed ID: 28104320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of biofilm removal with hand, rotary nickel-titanium, and self-adjusting file instrumentation using a novel in vitro biofilm model. Lin J; Shen Y; Haapasalo M J Endod; 2013 May; 39(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 23611386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals. Gagliardi J; Versiani MA; de Sousa-Neto MD; Plazas-Garzon A; Basrani B J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1718-24. PubMed ID: 26321062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study. Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of Biofilm Assays to Assess Antibiofilm Efficacy in Instrumented Root Canals after Syringe Irrigation and Sonic Agitation. Kishen A; Shrestha A; Del Carpio-Perochena A J Endod; 2018 Feb; 44(2):292-298. PubMed ID: 29254815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture strength of roots instrumented with self-adjusting file and the ProTaper rotary systems. Capar ID; Altunsoy M; Arslan H; Ertas H; Aydinbelge HA J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 24666910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability. Williamson AE; Sandor AJ; Justman BC J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 19084136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analyses of ion release, pH and multispecies biofilm formation between conventional and bioactive gutta-percha. Carvalho CN; Wang Z; Shen Y; Gavini G; Martinelli JR; Manso A; Haapasalo M Int Endod J; 2016 Nov; 49(11):1048-1056. PubMed ID: 26443466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Schäfer E; Vlassis M Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and RECIPROC instruments. Cakici F; Cakici EB; Küçükekenci FF; Uygun AD; Arslan H Int J Artif Organs; 2016 May; 39(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 27034317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical reduction in intracanal Enterococcus faecalis when using three different single-file systems: an ex vivo comparative study. Üreyen Kaya B; Erik CE; Sesli Çetin E; Köle M; Maden M Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 29985531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Analysis of Dentinal Crack Formation Following Root Canal Instrumentation with Hand K-Flex Files, ProTaper Next, and Self-adjusting Files. Jacob J; Paul M; Sara B; Steaphen P; Philip N; Mathew J J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):935-939. PubMed ID: 31797850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The self-adjusting file instrumentation results in less debris extrusion apically when compared to WaveOne and ProTaper NEXT. Pawar AM; Pawar MG; Metzger Z; Kokate SR J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 25829683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT. Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Efficacy of Rotary, Reciprocating, and Combined Non-Surgical Endodontic Retreatment Techniques in Removing a Carrier-Based Root Canal Filling Material from Straight Root Canal Systems: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis. Alakabani TF; Faus-Llácer V; Faus-Matoses I; Ruiz-Sánchez C; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Sauro S; Faus-Matoses V J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32630387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of cleaning ability of three nickel-titanium rotary systems: ProTaper universal, K3 and Mtwo: An Raut AW; Mantri V; Palekar A; Gadodia R; Kala S; Raut RA Niger Postgrad Med J; 2016; 23(4):221-226. PubMed ID: 28000644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals. Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentinal damage and fracture resistance of oval roots prepared with single-file systems using different kinematics. Abou El Nasr HM; Abd El Kader KG J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 24862715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Different Instrumentation Techniques on Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth. Tavanafar S; Karimpour A; Karimpour H; Mohammed Saleh A; Hamed Saeed M J Dent (Shiraz); 2015 Mar; 16(1 Suppl):50-5. PubMed ID: 26106635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]