These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32019234)

  • 1. A Quantitative Study of the Secondary Acoustic Radiation Force on Biological Cells during Acoustophoresis.
    Saeidi D; Saghafian M; Haghjooy Javanmard S; Wiklund M
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 32019234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic dipole and monopole effects in solid particle interaction dynamics during acoustophoresis.
    Saeidi D; Saghafian M; Haghjooy Javanmard S; Hammarström B; Wiklund M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3311. PubMed ID: 31255151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustophoresis of disk-shaped microparticles: A numerical and experimental study of acoustic radiation forces and torques.
    Garbin A; Leibacher I; Hahn P; Le Ferrand H; Studart A; Dual J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2759-69. PubMed ID: 26627752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic separation of living and dead cells using high density medium.
    Olofsson K; Hammarström B; Wiklund M
    Lab Chip; 2020 Jun; 20(11):1981-1990. PubMed ID: 32356853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging the position-dependent 3D force on microbeads subjected to acoustic radiation forces and streaming.
    Lamprecht A; Lakämper S; Baasch T; Schaap IA; Dual J
    Lab Chip; 2016 Jul; 16(14):2682-93. PubMed ID: 27302661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasonic manipulation of particles and cells. Ultrasonic separation of cells.
    Coakley WT; Whitworth G; Grundy MA; Gould RK; Allman R
    Bioseparation; 1994 Apr; 4(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 7765041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On-chip fluorescence-activated cell sorting by an integrated miniaturized ultrasonic transducer.
    Johansson L; Nikolajeff F; Johansson S; Thorslund S
    Anal Chem; 2009 Jul; 81(13):5188-96. PubMed ID: 19492800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of polymer-shelled microbubble motions in acoustophoresis.
    Kothapalli SV; Wiklund M; Janerot-Sjoberg B; Paradossi G; Grishenkov D
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():275-83. PubMed ID: 27261567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impedance matched channel walls in acoustofluidic systems.
    Leibacher I; Schatzer S; Dual J
    Lab Chip; 2014 Feb; 14(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexural wave-based soft attractor walls for trapping microparticles and cells.
    Aghakhani A; Cetin H; Erkoc P; Tombak GI; Sitti M
    Lab Chip; 2021 Feb; 21(3):582-596. PubMed ID: 33355319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dominated acoustophoresis driven by surface acoustic waves.
    Guo J; Kang Y; Ai Y
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2015 Oct; 455():203-11. PubMed ID: 26070191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient purification of CD4+ lymphocytes from peripheral blood progenitor cell products using affinity bead acoustophoresis.
    Lenshof A; Jamal A; Dykes J; Urbansky A; Astrand-Grundström I; Laurell T; Scheding S
    Cytometry A; 2014 Nov; 85(11):933-41. PubMed ID: 25053536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustophoretic Control of Microparticle Transport Using Dual-Wavelength Surface Acoustic Wave Devices.
    Hsu JC; Hsu CH; Huang YW
    Micromachines (Basel); 2019 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 30642118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Residue-free acoustofluidic manipulation of microparticles via removal of microchannel anechoic corner.
    Khan MS; Sahin MA; Destgeer G; Park J
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2022 Sep; 89():106161. PubMed ID: 36088893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Pumpless Acoustofluidic Platform for Size-Selective Concentration and Separation of Microparticles.
    Ahmed H; Destgeer G; Park J; Jung JH; Ahmad R; Park K; Sung HJ
    Anal Chem; 2017 Dec; 89(24):13575-13581. PubMed ID: 29156880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of the acoustic radiation force of ultrasonic standing waves in half-wavelength and quarter-wavelength micro-resonators of cylindrical geometry.
    Yang IH; Kim N
    Ultrasonics; 2024 Mar; 138():107267. PubMed ID: 38367402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical study of acoustophoretic motion of particles in a PDMS microchannel driven by surface acoustic waves.
    Nama N; Barnkob R; Mao Z; Kähler CJ; Costanzo F; Huang TJ
    Lab Chip; 2015 Jun; 15(12):2700-9. PubMed ID: 26001199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical analysis for transverse microbead trapping using 30 MHz focused ultrasound in ray acoustics regime.
    Lee J
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 23809757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward optimal acoustophoretic microparticle manipulation by exploiting asymmetry.
    Tahmasebipour A; Friedrich L; Begley M; Bruus H; Meinhart C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jul; 148(1):359. PubMed ID: 32752779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fabrication of Silicon Microfluidic Chips for Acoustic Particle Focusing Using Direct Laser Writing.
    Fornell A; Söderbäck P; Liu Z; De Albuquerque Moreira M; Tenje M
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 31972982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.