These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3201942)

  • 1. High-frequency audiometry: air- and electric bone-conduction.
    Okstad S; Mair IW; Laukli E
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1988; 449():159-60. PubMed ID: 3201942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carhart notch effect in otosclerotic ears measured by electric bone-conduction audiometry.
    Löppönen H; Laitakari K
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):160-2. PubMed ID: 11318454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-frequency audiometry: comparison of electric bone-conduction and air-conduction thresholds.
    Okstad S; Laukli E; Mair IW
    Audiology; 1988; 27(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 3377723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Correlations between the results of the Peyser's test and the auditory threshold for air conduction].
    Kołdej E
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1985; 39(5):400-5. PubMed ID: 4094774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Air conduction thresholds and secretory otitis media: a conventional and extra-high frequency audiometric comparison.
    Mair IW; Fjermedal O; Laukli E
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Oct; 98(10):767-71. PubMed ID: 2802458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Audiometry over an expanded frequency range in the diagnosis of different forms of otosclerosis].
    Kholopova RV; Dovgaliuk AIu
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1979; (5):20-3. PubMed ID: 494754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Biagio L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recommended procedure for pure-tone bone-conduction audiometry without masking using a manually operated instrument. British Society of Audiology--technical note.
    Br J Audiol; 1985 Nov; 19(4):281-2. PubMed ID: 4074981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children.
    Rahko-Laitila P; Karma P; Laippala P; Salmelin R; Sipilä M; Manninen M; Rahko T
    Audiology; 2001; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-assessment of bone conduction hearing threshold using mobile audiometry: comparison with pure tone audiometry.
    Masalski M; Turski M; Zatoński T
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jul; 63(7):535-542. PubMed ID: 37162277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-frequency air-conduction and electric bone-conduction audiometry. Age and sex variations.
    Löppönen H; Sorri M; Bloigu R
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 1842287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT; Hildreth AJ; Lindsey L
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masked high-frequency bone-conduction audiometry: test reliability.
    McDermott JC; Fausti SA; Henry JA; Frey RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Apr; 2(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 1768879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A practical method to differentiate the sensations of hearing and feeling (auditory and vibration threshold) in the low-frequency range (author's transl)].
    Hülse M; Wisser R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Dec; 60(12):624-7. PubMed ID: 7345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of age, type of audiometry and child's concentration on hearing thresholds.
    MRC Multi-centre Otitis Media Study Group
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Aug; 34(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 10997452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeatability of high-frequency bone conduction thresholds.
    Frank T; Ragland AE
    Ear Hear; 1987 Dec; 8(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 3322900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.