249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32019544)
1. Objective evaluation of postoperative changes in real-life activity levels in the postoperative course of lumbar spinal surgery using wearable trackers.
Inoue M; Orita S; Inage K; Suzuki M; Fujimoto K; Shiga Y; Kanamoto H; Abe K; Kinoshita H; Norimoto M; Umimura T; Sato T; Sato M; Suzuki M; Enomoto K; Eguchi Y; Akazawa T; Aoki Y; Kawasaki Y; Ohtori S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):72. PubMed ID: 32019544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional and radiological outcomes of 360 degrees fusion of three or more motion levels in the lumbar spine for degenerative disc disease.
Suratwala SJ; Pinto MR; Gilbert TJ; Winter RB; Wroblewski JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):E351-8. PubMed ID: 19404164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in U.S. servicemen.
Molinari RW; Sloboda JF; Arrington EC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Feb; 18 Suppl():S24-9. PubMed ID: 15699802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective study of the interrelationship between subjective and objective measures of disability before and 2 months after lumbar decompression surgery for disc herniation.
Mannion AF; Dvorak J; Müntener M; Grob D
Eur Spine J; 2005 Jun; 14(5):454-65. PubMed ID: 15830214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease using a minimally invasive B-twin expandable spinal spacer: a multicenter study.
Folman Y; Lee SH; Silvera JR; Gepstein R
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Oct; 16(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 14526194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective multicenter phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of NOVOCART Disc plus autologous disc chondrocyte transplantation in the treatment of nucleotomized and degenerative lumbar disc to avoid secondary disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tschugg A; Michnacs F; Strowitzki M; Meisel HJ; Thomé C
Trials; 2016 Feb; 17(1):108. PubMed ID: 26920137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up.
Liang Y; Shi W; Jiang C; Chen Z; Liu F; Feng Z; Jiang X
Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24(11):2560-6. PubMed ID: 25870077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.
Asher AL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Nian H; Dittus RS; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Glassman SD; Bydon M; Archer KR; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 26989974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What every spine surgeon should know about transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery for herniated discs.
Çaçan MA; Uçar BY
Int Orthop; 2019 Apr; 43(4):883-889. PubMed ID: 30565176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years.
Yorimitsu E; Chiba K; Toyama Y; Hirabayashi K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 11246379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in back pain after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and annuloplasty for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study.
Choi KC; Kim JS; Kang BU; Lee CD; Lee SH
Pain Med; 2011 Nov; 12(11):1615-21. PubMed ID: 21992543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequestrectomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: no clinical benefit after 10 years follow-up.
Hoff E; Strube P; Gross C; Putzier M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):887-95. PubMed ID: 23232214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.
Blumenthal S; McAfee PC; Guyer RD; Hochschuler SH; Geisler FH; Holt RT; Garcia R; Regan JJ; Ohnmeiss DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. PubMed ID: 16025024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamics of improvement following total lumbar disc replacement: is the outcome predictable?
Siepe CJ; Tepass A; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Beisse R; Korge A; Mayer HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19927108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low back pain after lumbar discectomy in patients showing endplate modic type 1 change.
Ohtori S; Yamashita M; Yamauchi K; Inoue G; Koshi T; Suzuki M; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Ochiai N; Kishida S; Takaso M; Aoki Y; Ishikawa T; Arai G; Miyagi M; Kamoda H; Nakamura J; Takahashi K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):E596-600. PubMed ID: 20461034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
