These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32020833)

  • 1. Asymptotic versus exact methods in the analysis of contingency tables: Evidence-based practical recommendations.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2569-2582. PubMed ID: 32020833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A discussion on significance indices for contingency tables under small sample sizes.
    Oliveira NL; Pereira CAB; Diniz MA; Polpo A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0199102. PubMed ID: 30071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exact and asymptotic tests for homogeneity in several 2 x 2 tables.
    Reis IM; Hirji KF; Afifi AA
    Stat Med; 1999 Apr; 18(8):893-906. PubMed ID: 10363329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Kang SH; Ahn CW
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2524-35. PubMed ID: 17847031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional.
    Fagerland MW; Lydersen S; Laake P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():91. PubMed ID: 23848987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of residuals in contingency tables: another nail in the coffin of conditional approaches to significance testing.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Mar; 47(1):147-61. PubMed ID: 24788323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact unconditional tests for a 2 x 2 matched-pairs design.
    Berger RL; Sidik K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):91-108. PubMed ID: 12665205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choice of test for association in small sample unordered r x c tables.
    Lydersen S; Pradhan V; Senchaudhuri P; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4328-43. PubMed ID: 17311220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exact unconditional tests for testing non-inferiority in matched-pairs design.
    Sidik K
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 12520561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymptotic log-linear analysis: some cautions concerning sparse frequency tables.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ; Johnston JE
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Feb; 94(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15077743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fisher's exact approach for post hoc analysis of a chi-squared test.
    Shan G; Gerstenberger S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188709. PubMed ID: 29261690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Categorical independence tests for large sparse r-way contingency tables.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):606-10. PubMed ID: 12434857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cannons and sparrows II: the enhanced Bernoulli exact method for determining statistical significance and effect size in the meta-analysis of k 2 × 2 tables.
    Paul LM
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 34344389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient statistical inference for a parallel study with missing data by using an exact method.
    Shan G; Hutson A; Wilding GE; Ma C; Tian GL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):478-490. PubMed ID: 31017028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cannons and sparrows: an exact maximum likelihood non-parametric test for meta-analysis of k 2 × 2 tables.
    Paul LM
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2018; 15():9. PubMed ID: 29983722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exact tests for the analysis of case-control studies of genetic markers.
    Neuhäuser M
    Hum Hered; 2002; 54(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 12626847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test of Association Between Two Ordinal Variables While Adjusting for Covariates.
    Li C; Shepherd BE
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2010 Jun; 105(490):612-620. PubMed ID: 20882122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conditional and Unconditional Tests (and Sample Size) Based on Multiple Comparisons for Stratified 2 × 2 Tables.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I; Álvarez Hernández M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():147038. PubMed ID: 26075012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.