These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32021922)

  • 21. Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():501. PubMed ID: 27186465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of a framework for resilience measurement: Suggestion of fuzzy Resilience Grade (RG) and fuzzy Resilience Early Warning Grade (REWG).
    Omidvar M; Mazloumi A; Mohammad Fam I; Nirumand F
    Work; 2017; 56(3):463-474. PubMed ID: 28269808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Hybrid FMCDM Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of Homestays.
    Chou TY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distance education tool selection using novel spherical fuzzy AHP EDAS.
    Menekşe A; Camgöz Akdağ H
    Soft comput; 2022; 26(4):1617-1635. PubMed ID: 35095335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Hybrid Fuzzy Decision Model for Evaluating MEMS and IC Integration Technologies.
    Lee QY; Lee MX; Lee YC
    Micromachines (Basel); 2021 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 33799935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Constructing the Indicators of Assessing Human Vulnerability to Industrial Chemical Accidents: A Consensus-based Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy AHP Approach.
    Fatemi F; Ardalan A; Aguirre B; Mansouri N; Mohammadfam I
    PLoS Curr; 2017 Apr; 9():. PubMed ID: 28480124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Strategies for controlling violence against health care workers: Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy additive ratio assessment.
    Rajabi F; Jahangiri M; Bagherifard F; Banaee S; Farhadi P
    J Nurs Manag; 2020 May; 28(4):777-786. PubMed ID: 32104935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of risk factors in forest road design and construction activities with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in Turkey.
    Akay AO; Demir M; Akgul M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):561. PubMed ID: 30167894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A combination of extended fuzzy AHP and fuzzy GRA for government E-tendering in hybrid fuzzy environment.
    Wang Y; Xi C; Zhang S; Yu D; Zhang W; Li Y
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():123675. PubMed ID: 25057506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives.
    Vahidnia MH; Alesheikh AA; Alimohammadi A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):3048-56. PubMed ID: 19477577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A weighted fuzzy approach for the agility of sustainable product development process assessment: A case study in Chinese medium-sized enterprises.
    Zhining Z; Alli H; Ahmadipour M; Che Me R
    Heliyon; 2024 Jul; 10(13):e34138. PubMed ID: 39071662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Real-Time Robotic Presentation Skill Scoring Using Multi-Model Analysis and Fuzzy Delphi-Analytic Hierarchy Process.
    Alshammari RFN; Abd Rahman AH; Arshad H; Albahri OS
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Homogeneous MADM Methods: Is Trade-Off between Attributes Important?
    Arman A; Arman H; Hadi-Vencheh A
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():8629986. PubMed ID: 36045955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Data and calculation approach of the fuzzy AHP risk assessment of a large hydroelectric project.
    Ribas JR; Arce ME; Sohler FA; Suárez-García A
    Data Brief; 2019 Aug; 25():104294. PubMed ID: 31497629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on binary connection number of set pair analysis.
    Shen Q; Lou J; Liu Y; Jiang Y
    Soft comput; 2021; 25(23):14797-14807. PubMed ID: 34629955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():601. PubMed ID: 27247897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facility Layout Planning with SHELL and Fuzzy AHP Method Based on Human Reliability for Operating Theatre.
    Lin Q; Wang D
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():8563528. PubMed ID: 30792832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A proposed theoretical framework.
    Zhou R; Chan AH
    Work; 2017; 56(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 28035943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A test case.
    Zhou R; Chan AH
    Work; 2017; 56(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 28035942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Compatibility and correlation of multi-attribute decision making: a case of industrial relocation.
    Martino Neto J; Salomon VAP; Ortiz-Barrios MA; Petrillo A
    Ann Oper Res; 2022 Feb; ():1-22. PubMed ID: 35250141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.