These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32022315)

  • 1. Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 32022315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust bivariate random-effects model for accommodating outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3308-3325. PubMed ID: 32469266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method for synthesizing test accuracy data outperformed the bivariate method.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Kostoulas P; Doi SAR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Apr; 132():51-58. PubMed ID: 33333166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using generalized linear mixed models.
    Chu H; Guo H; Zhou Y
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 19959794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis models for diagnostic test accuracy studies using arcsine-based transformations.
    Negeri ZF; Shaikh M; Beyene J
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):827-844. PubMed ID: 29748967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of simple pooling and bivariate model used in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy published in Chinese journals].
    Huang YS; Yang ZR; Zhan SY
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jun; 47(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 26080880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Guolo A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 28077079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple and robust method for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Chen Y; Liu Y; Chu H; Ting Lee ML; Schmid CH
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):105-121. PubMed ID: 27580758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New measures improved the reporting of heterogeneity in diagnostic test accuracy reviews: a metaepidemiological study.
    Plana MN; Pérez T; Zamora J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():101-112. PubMed ID: 33227449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data.
    Takwoingi Y; Guo B; Riley RD; Deeks JJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1896-1911. PubMed ID: 26116616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tutorial: statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Schlattmann P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Apr; 61(5):777-794. PubMed ID: 36656998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical methods for detecting outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1227-1242. PubMed ID: 31203742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta-binomial distributions and bivariate copulas.
    Kuss O; Hoyer A; Solms A
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 23873593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pseudo-likelihood approach for multivariate meta-analysis of test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds.
    Guolo A; To DK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jan; 30(1):204-220. PubMed ID: 32787534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Latent class bivariate model for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Eusebi P; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jul; 14():88. PubMed ID: 25015209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of computational methods for aggregate data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Zhao Y; Khan B; Negeri ZF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 May; 24(1):111. PubMed ID: 38730436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-DiSc 2.0: a web application for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
    Plana MN; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Fernández-García S; Soto J; Fabregate M; Pérez T; Roqué M; Zamora J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):306. PubMed ID: 36443653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using marginal standardisation to estimate relative risk without dichotomising continuous outcomes.
    Chen Y; Ning Y; Kao SL; Støer NC; Müller-Riemenschneider F; Venkataraman K; Khoo EYH; Tai ES; Tan CS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):165. PubMed ID: 31357938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.