319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32024528)
1. Human arm weight compensation in rehabilitation robotics: efficacy of three distinct methods.
Just F; Özen Ö; Tortora S; Klamroth-Marganska V; Riener R; Rauter G
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Feb; 17(1):13. PubMed ID: 32024528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feedforward model based arm weight compensation with the rehabilitation robot ARMin.
Just F; Ozen O; Tortora S; Riener R; Rauter G
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():72-77. PubMed ID: 28813796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Music meets robotics: a prospective randomized study on motivation during robot aided therapy.
Baur K; Speth F; Nagle A; Riener R; Klamroth-Marganska V
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Aug; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 30115082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The "Beam-Me-In Strategy" - remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy.
Baur K; Rohrbach N; Hermsdörfer J; Riener R; Klamroth-Marganska V
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 16(1):85. PubMed ID: 31296226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of gravity compensation on muscle activation patterns during different temporal phases of arm movements of stroke patients.
Prange GB; Jannink MJ; Stienen AH; van der Kooij H; Ijzerman MJ; Hermens HJ
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Jun; 23(5):478-85. PubMed ID: 19190089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human arm joints reconstruction algorithm in rehabilitation therapies assisted by end-effector robotic devices.
Bertomeu-Motos A; Blanco A; Badesa FJ; Barios JA; Zollo L; Garcia-Aracil N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 29458397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization and wearability evaluation of a fully portable wrist exoskeleton for unsupervised training after stroke.
Lambelet C; Temiraliuly D; Siegenthaler M; Wirth M; Woolley DG; Lambercy O; Gassert R; Wenderoth N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Oct; 17(1):132. PubMed ID: 33028354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and pilot testing of HEXORR: hand EXOskeleton rehabilitation robot.
Schabowsky CN; Godfrey SB; Holley RJ; Lum PS
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 7():36. PubMed ID: 20667083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and robot hybrid system for multi-joint coordinated upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.
Rong W; Li W; Pang M; Hu J; Wei X; Yang B; Wai H; Zheng X; Hu X
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 14(1):34. PubMed ID: 28446181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An EMG-Controlled Robotic Hand Exoskeleton for Bilateral Rehabilitation.
Leonardis D; Barsotti M; Loconsole C; Solazzi M; Troncossi M; Mazzotti C; Castelli VP; Procopio C; Lamola G; Chisari C; Bergamasco M; Frisoli A
IEEE Trans Haptics; 2015; 8(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 25838528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Hybrid Arm-Hand Rehabilitation Robot With EMG-Based Admittance Controller.
Xie C; Yang Q; Huang Y; Su S; Xu T; Song R
IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2021 Dec; 15(6):1332-1342. PubMed ID: 34813476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distal versus proximal - an investigation on different supportive strategies by robots for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Qian Q; Nam C; Guo Z; Huang Y; Hu X; Ng SC; Zheng Y; Poon W
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 31159822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation.
Fong J; Crocher V; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Mareels I
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():771-776. PubMed ID: 28813913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison between electromyography-driven robot and passive motion device on wrist rehabilitation for chronic stroke.
Hu XL; Tong KY; Song R; Zheng XJ; Leung WW
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Oct; 23(8):837-46. PubMed ID: 19531605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot study on the design and validation of a hybrid exoskeleton robotic device for hand rehabilitation.
Haghshenas-Jaryani M; Patterson RM; Bugnariu N; Wijesundara MBJ
J Hand Ther; 2020; 33(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 32423846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exerciser for rehabilitation of the Arm (ERA): Development and unique features of a 3D end-effector robot.
Milot MH; Hamel M; Provost PO; Bernier-Ouellet J; Dupuis M; Letourneau D; Briere S; Michaud F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5833-5836. PubMed ID: 28269581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pilot Study of a Powered Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Based on the Wheelchair.
Meng Q; Xie Q; Shao H; Cao W; Wang F; Wang L; Yu H; Li S
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():9627438. PubMed ID: 31976331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining User Intent of Partly Dynamic Shoulder Tasks in Individuals With Chronic Stroke Using Pattern Recognition.
Kopke JV; Ellis MD; Hargrove LJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Jan; 28(1):350-358. PubMed ID: 31751245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
