These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32025475)

  • 1. The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation.
    Reed C; Budzynska K; Duthie R; Janier M; Konat B; Lawrence J; Pease A; Snaith M
    Philos Technol; 2017; 30(2):137-160. PubMed ID: 32025475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Annotating Argument Schemes.
    Visser J; Lawrence J; Reed C; Wagemans J; Walton D
    Argumentation; 2021; 35(1):101-139. PubMed ID: 33678987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.
    Lillo-Unglaube M; Canales-Johnson A; Navarrete G; Bravo CF
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1420. PubMed ID: 25566112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How argumentation theory can inform assessment validity: A critical review.
    Kinnear B; Schumacher DJ; Driessen EW; Varpio L
    Med Educ; 2022 Nov; 56(11):1064-1075. PubMed ID: 35851965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legitimation Without Argumentation: An Empirical Discourse Analysis of 'Validity as an Argument' in Assessment.
    Kinnear B; Schumacher DJ; Varpio L; Driessen EW; Konopasky A
    Perspect Med Educ; 2024; 13(1):469-480. PubMed ID: 39372230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sketching the vision of the Web of Debates.
    Bikakis A; Flouris G; Patkos T; Plexousakis D
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1124045. PubMed ID: 37396970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing a Conversational Agent's Capability to Identify Structural Wrongness in Arguments Based on Toulmin's Model of Arguments.
    Mirzababaei B; Pammer-Schindler V
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():645516. PubMed ID: 34927062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans.
    Walton D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1507-1528. PubMed ID: 28000092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of argumentation in tutorial dialogues with an Intelligent Tutoring System for genetic risk of breast cancer.
    Cedillos-Whynott EM; Wolfe CR; Widmer CL; Brust-Renck PG; Weil A; Reyna VF
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):857-68. PubMed ID: 26511370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Argudas: lessons for argumentation in biology based on a gene expression use case.
    McLeod K; Ferguson G; Burger A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jan; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 22372999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Argumentation schemes, fallacies, and evidence in politicians' argumentative tweets-A coded dataset.
    Macagno F
    Data Brief; 2022 Oct; 44():108501. PubMed ID: 35990918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Arguments from Developmental Order.
    Stöckle-Schobel R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():751. PubMed ID: 27242648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty.
    Straßer C; Michajlova L
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1133998. PubMed ID: 37275534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring university students' ability to recognize argument structures and fallacies.
    Berkle Y; Schmitt L; Tolzin A; Janson A; Wambsganss T; Leimeister JM; Leuchter M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1270931. PubMed ID: 38125865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do validity experts conceptualise argumentation? It's a rhetorical question.
    Kinnear B; Martini A; Varpio L; Driessen EW; Schumacher DJ
    Med Educ; 2024 Aug; 58(8):989-997. PubMed ID: 38238042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pupils' evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation.
    Glassner A; Weinstock M; Neuman Y
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2005 Mar; 75(Pt 1):105-18. PubMed ID: 15831184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of argument structure on judgements of argument strength, function, and adequacy.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Apr; 61(4):641-64. PubMed ID: 18938280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Devil is in the Framework. Comment on Mizrahi vs. all Debate on the Strength of Arguments from an Expert Opinion.
    Makuła S
    Philosophia (Ramat Gan); 2022; 50(4):1999-2013. PubMed ID: 35469246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Argumentation and explanation in the law.
    Rotolo A; Sartor G
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1130559. PubMed ID: 37731604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Narrative Argumentation in Political Letters to the Editor].
    Schröter J
    Z Literaturwissenschaft Linguist; 2021; 51(2):229-253. PubMed ID: 38624653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.