296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32025702)
1. Genomic diversity affects the accuracy of bacterial single-nucleotide polymorphism-calling pipelines.
Bush SJ; Foster D; Eyre DW; Clark EL; De Maio N; Shaw LP; Stoesser N; Peto TEA; Crook DW; Walker AS
Gigascience; 2020 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 32025702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Read trimming has minimal effect on bacterial SNP-calling accuracy.
Bush SJ
Microb Genom; 2020 Dec; 6(12):. PubMed ID: 33332257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants.
Hwang S; Kim E; Lee I; Marcotte EM
Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17875. PubMed ID: 26639839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of variant calling tools for large plant genome re-sequencing.
Yao Z; You FM; N'Diaye A; Knox RE; McCartney C; Hiebert CW; Pozniak C; Xu W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):360. PubMed ID: 32807073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genome-Wide SNP Calling from Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) Data: A Comparison of Seven Pipelines and Two Sequencing Technologies.
Torkamaneh D; Laroche J; Belzile F
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161333. PubMed ID: 27547936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals.
Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT
Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing genomic variant identification protocols for
Li X; Muñoz JF; Gade L; Argimon S; Bougnoux ME; Bowers JR; Chow NA; Cuesta I; Farrer RA; Maufrais C; Monroy-Nieto J; Pradhan D; Uehling J; Vu D; Yeats CA; Aanensen DM; d'Enfert C; Engelthaler DM; Eyre DW; Fisher MC; Hagen F; Meyer W; Singh G; Alastruey-Izquierdo A; Litvintseva AP; Cuomo CA
Microb Genom; 2023 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 37043380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analytical workflow for accurate variant discovery in highly divergent regions.
Tian S; Yan H; Neuhauser C; Slager SL
BMC Genomics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):703. PubMed ID: 27590916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low impact of different SNP panels from two building-loci pipelines on RAD-Seq population genomic metrics: case study on five diverse aquatic species.
Casanova A; Maroso F; Blanco A; Hermida M; Ríos N; García G; Manuzzi A; Zane L; Verissimo A; García-Marín JL; Bouza C; Vera M; Martínez P
BMC Genomics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):150. PubMed ID: 33653268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of seven SNP calling pipelines for the next-generation sequencing data of chickens.
Liu J; Shen Q; Bao H
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262574. PubMed ID: 35100292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An optimized genomic VCF workflow for precise identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cluster from cross-platform whole genome sequencing data.
Disratthakit A; Toyo-Oka L; Thawong P; Paiboonsiri P; Wichukjinda N; Ajawatanawong P; Thipkrua N; Suthum K; Palittapongarnpim P; Tokunaga K; Mahasirimongkol S
Infect Genet Evol; 2020 Apr; 79():104152. PubMed ID: 31881359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reference-free SNP calling: improved accuracy by preventing incorrect calls from repetitive genomic regions.
Dou J; Zhao X; Fu X; Jiao W; Wang N; Zhang L; Hu X; Wang S; Bao Z
Biol Direct; 2012 Jun; 7():17. PubMed ID: 22682067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ComB: SNP calling and mapping analysis for color and nucleotide space platforms.
Souaiaia T; Frazier Z; Chen T
J Comput Biol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):795-807. PubMed ID: 21563978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of SNP calling using single and multiple-sample calling algorithms by validation against array base genotyping and Mendelian inheritance.
Kumar P; Al-Shafai M; Al Muftah WA; Chalhoub N; Elsaid MF; Aleem AA; Suhre K
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Oct; 7():747. PubMed ID: 25339461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From reference genomes to population genomics: comparing three reference-aligned reduced-representation sequencing pipelines in two wildlife species.
Wright B; Farquharson KA; McLennan EA; Belov K; Hogg CJ; Grueber CE
BMC Genomics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):453. PubMed ID: 31159724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. UGbS-Flex, a novel bioinformatics pipeline for imputation-free SNP discovery in polyploids without a reference genome: finger millet as a case study.
Qi P; Gimode D; Saha D; Schröder S; Chakraborty D; Wang X; Dida MM; Malmberg RL; Devos KM
BMC Plant Biol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 29902967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative investigation of single nucleotide variant calling for a personal non-Caucasian sequencing sample.
Park H; Gim J
Genes Genomics; 2023 Dec; 45(12):1527-1536. PubMed ID: 37651066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Cautionary Note on the Use of Genotype Callers in Phylogenomics.
Duchen P; Salamin N
Syst Biol; 2021 Jun; 70(4):844-854. PubMed ID: 33084875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
