These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32027160)
1. Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Wells GL; Kovera MB; Douglass AB; Brewer N; Meissner CA; Wixted JT Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):3-36. PubMed ID: 32027160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The American Psychology-Law Society scientific review paper on the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Costanzo M; Levett LM Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 32027159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Administrator blindness affects the recording of eyewitness lineup outcomes. Rodriguez DN; Berry MA Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 31535891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model. Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An expected cost model of eyewitness identification. Yang Y; Smalarz L; Moody SA; Cabell JJ; Copp CJ Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):205-219. PubMed ID: 31045389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification. Akan M; Robinson MM; Mickes L; Wixted JT; Benjamin AS J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):369-392. PubMed ID: 33271047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making. Eisen ML; Ying RC; Chui C; Swaby MA Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 35604705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychological science on eyewitness identification and its impact on police practices and policies. Wells GL Am Psychol; 2020 Dec; 75(9):1316-1329. PubMed ID: 33382302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal actors' and laypersons' utility judgments of eyewitness lineup procedures and outcomes. Zimmerman DM; Rodriguez DN Law Hum Behav; 2024 Apr; 48(2):117-132. PubMed ID: 38602805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt. Price HL; Bruer KC; Adkins MC Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four utilities in eyewitness identification practice: Dissociations between receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and expected utility analysis. Lampinen JM; Smith AM; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):26-44. PubMed ID: 30382722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Lee J; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Bayesian analysis on the (dis)utility of iterative-showup procedures: The moderating impact of prior probabilities. Smith AM; Lindsay RC; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):503-16. PubMed ID: 27182619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From the lab to the police station. A successful application of eyewitness research. Wells GL; Malpass RS; Lindsay RC; Fisher RP; Turtle JW; Fulero SM Am Psychol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):581-98. PubMed ID: 10892200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the interpretation of verbal eyewitness confidence statements by distinguishing perceptions of certainty from those of accuracy. Grabman JH; Cash DK; Slane CR; Dodson CS J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Sep; 28(3):589-605. PubMed ID: 34081495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison. Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eyewitness testimony. Wells GL; Olson EA Annu Rev Psychol; 2003; 54():277-95. PubMed ID: 12209024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]