212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32027190)
1. Comparison of Higher-Order Aberrations after LASEK between Two Different Laser Platforms for Low-to-Moderate Myopia.
Liu L; Li M; Shi YH; Sun LN; Wang F; Zou J
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Sep; 45(9):1036-1042. PubMed ID: 32027190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Higher order aberrations of the corneal surface after laser subepithelial keratomileusis.
Jung HH; Ji YS; Oh HJ; Yoon KC
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 25120336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.
Al-Zeraid FM; Osuagwu UL
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 16():29. PubMed ID: 27000109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical study on combining femtosecond thin- flap and LASIK with the Triple-A profile for high myopia correction.
Li K; Zhang CW; Hong DJ; Wu J; Yao YS
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 19(1):107. PubMed ID: 31077191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Visual Quality After SMILE and LASEK for Mild to Moderate Myopia.
Yu M; Chen M; Wang B; Zou L; Zhu X; Dai J
J Refract Surg; 2015 Dec; 31(12):795-800. PubMed ID: 26653723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of higher order aberrations after implantable Collamer Lens implantation and wavefront-guided LASEK in high myopia.
Shin JY; Ahn H; Seo KY; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Refract Surg; 2012 Feb; 28(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 22074464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided myopic femtosecond LASIK].
Anderle R; Ventruba J; Š S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2015 Jan; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 25959784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes.
Kim J; Choi SH; Lim DH; Yang CM; Yoon GJ; Chung TY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 45(7):959-965. PubMed ID: 31196580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for low myopia.
Fu M; Li M; Wei R; Zhang C; Huang Y; Niu L; Wang X; Zhang H; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):347. PubMed ID: 35978275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes and ocular aberrations following wavefront optimized and topography-guided customized femtosecond laser
Tiwari NN; Sachdev GS; Ramamurthy S; Dandapani R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 66(11):1558-1561. PubMed ID: 30355860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pilot study: LASEK with the Triple-A profile of a MEL 90 for mild and moderate myopia.
Chen Y; Yang D; Han T; Xu H; Li M; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):98. PubMed ID: 28645265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of higher order aberrations after LASIK and LASEK for myopia.
McAlinden C; Moore JE
J Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 26(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 20199012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Chung SH; Lee IS; Lee YG; Lee HK; Kim EK; Yoon G; Seo KY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia.
Yang W; Liu S; Li M; Shen Y; Zhou X
Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(4):427-433. PubMed ID: 31805561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes of optimized prolate ablation and custom aspheric treatment in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Kang EC; Choi BJ; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 38(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 22340605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Wavefront-Optimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK.
Ozulken K; Yuksel E; Tekin K; Kiziltoprak H; Aydogan S
J Refract Surg; 2019 Apr; 35(4):222-229. PubMed ID: 30984979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of preoperative pupil offset on corneal higher-order aberrations after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.
Liu Z; Zhao Y; Sun S; Wu Y; Wang G; Zhao S; Huang Y
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Jun; 23(1):247. PubMed ID: 37264322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and aspheric ablation profile with iris registration to correct myopia.
Wu J; Zhong X; Yang B; Wang Z; Yu K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1059-65. PubMed ID: 23809945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of visual and refractive results after transepithelial and mechanical photorefractive keratectomy in myopia.
Yildirim Y; Olcucu O; Alagoz N; Agca A; Karakucuk Y; Demirok A
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):627-633. PubMed ID: 28349503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
