These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32028073)

  • 1. Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults.
    Patalano AL; Zax A; Williams K; Mathias L; Cordes S; Barth H
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 May; 118():101273. PubMed ID: 32028073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability range and probability distortion in a gambling task.
    Xing C; Paul J; Zax A; Cordes S; Barth H; Patalano AL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():39-51. PubMed ID: 31096164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Academic decision making and prospect theory.
    Mowrer RR; Davidson WB
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):289-300. PubMed ID: 22049669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the shape of the probability weighting function.
    Gonzalez R; Wu G
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):129-66. PubMed ID: 10090801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dopaminergic Drug Effects on Probability Weighting during Risky Decision Making.
    Ojala KE; Janssen LK; Hashemi MM; Timmer MHM; Geurts DEM; Ter Huurne NP; Cools R; Sescousse G
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29632870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A versatile task for assessing decision-making abilities: the truck dispatcher framework.
    Schiebener J; Schulte FP; Hofmann J; Brand M
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2014; 21(4):241-59. PubMed ID: 25265306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choices change the temporal weighting of decision evidence.
    Talluri BC; Urai AE; Bronfman ZZ; Brezis N; Tsetsos K; Usher M; Donner TH
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Apr; 125(4):1468-1481. PubMed ID: 33689508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affective judgment and beneficial decision making: ventromedial prefrontal activity correlates with performance in the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Northoff G; Grimm S; Boeker H; Schmidt C; Bermpohl F; Heinzel A; Hell D; Boesiger P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 Jul; 27(7):572-87. PubMed ID: 16372256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural response to reward anticipation under risk is nonlinear in probabilities.
    Hsu M; Krajbich I; Zhao C; Camerer CF
    J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(7):2231-7. PubMed ID: 19228976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shallow Value Weighting Predicts Problem Gambling: A Parameter Estimation Analysis Using Cumulative Prospect Theory.
    Curtis ET; Curtis JL
    J Gambl Stud; 2024 Mar; 40(1):333-348. PubMed ID: 37225961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of numeracy and approximate number system acuity in predicting value and probability distortion.
    Patalano AL; Saltiel JR; Machlin L; Barth H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1820-9. PubMed ID: 26404634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wisdom of crowds and collective decision-making in a survival situation with complex information integration.
    Hamada D; Nakayama M; Saiki J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Oct; 5(1):48. PubMed ID: 33057843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A developmental study of risky decisions on the cake gambling task: age and gender analyses of probability estimation and reward evaluation.
    Van Leijenhorst L; Westenberg PM; Crone EA
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2008; 33(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 18443976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intuitive proportion judgment in number-line estimation: Converging evidence from multiple tasks.
    Slusser E; Barth H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Oct; 162():181-198. PubMed ID: 28605698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifted risk preferences in pathological gambling.
    Ligneul R; Sescousse G; Barbalat G; Domenech P; Dreher JC
    Psychol Med; 2013 May; 43(5):1059-68. PubMed ID: 22932231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):949-975. PubMed ID: 34370495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numeracy moderates the influence of task-irrelevant affect on probability weighting.
    Traczyk J; Fulawka K
    Cognition; 2016 Jun; 151():37-41. PubMed ID: 26968007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.