These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32028073)

  • 21. Higher Risk Taking and Impaired Probability Judgment in Behavioral Addiction.
    Asaoka Y; Won M; Morita T; Ishikawa E; Goto Y
    Int J Neuropsychopharmacol; 2020 Dec; 23(10):662-672. PubMed ID: 32574348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attribute attention and option attention in risky choice.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105441. PubMed ID: 37058827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Music-evoked incidental happiness modulates probability weighting during risky lottery choices.
    Schulreich S; Heussen YG; Gerhardt H; Mohr PN; Binkofski FC; Koelsch S; Heekeren HR
    Front Psychol; 2014 Jan; 4():981. PubMed ID: 24432007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prospect evaluation as a function of numeracy and probability denominator.
    Millroth P; Juslin P
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():1-9. PubMed ID: 25704578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decoupling Judgment and Decision Making: A Tale of Two Tails.
    Oral B; Dragicevic P; Telea A; Dimara E
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Oct; 30(10):6928-6940. PubMed ID: 38145516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Decision making under ambiguity but not under risk is related to problem gambling severity.
    Brevers D; Cleeremans A; Goudriaan AE; Bechara A; Kornreich C; Verbanck P; Noël X
    Psychiatry Res; 2012 Dec; 200(2-3):568-74. PubMed ID: 22521232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Temporal weighting of loudness: Comparison between two different psychophysical tasks.
    Ponsot E; Susini P; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):406-17. PubMed ID: 26827035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules.
    Brand M; Recknor EC; Grabenhorst F; Bechara A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Jan; 29(1):86-99. PubMed ID: 17162725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Strength and weight: The determinants of choice and confidence.
    Kvam PD; Pleskac TJ
    Cognition; 2016 Jul; 152():170-180. PubMed ID: 27093221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The bounded rationality of probability distortion.
    Zhang H; Ren X; Maloney LT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(36):22024-22034. PubMed ID: 32843344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spontaneous partitioning and proportion estimation in children's numerical judgments.
    Zax A; Slusser E; Barth H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Sep; 185():71-94. PubMed ID: 31108245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment.
    Denes-Raj V; Epstein S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 May; 66(5):819-29. PubMed ID: 8014830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Aging and conditional probability judgments: a global matching approach.
    Spaniol J; Bayen UJ
    Psychol Aging; 2005 Mar; 20(1):165-81. PubMed ID: 15769222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk.
    Trepel C; Fox CR; Poldrack RA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15795132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Amygdala volume is associated with risky probability cognition in gambling disorder.
    Takeuchi H; Tsurumi K; Murao T; Mizuta H; Murai T; Takahashi H
    Addict Biol; 2019 Jul; 24(4):802-810. PubMed ID: 30033531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Probability Weighting Functions Derived from Hyperbolic Time Discounting: Psychophysical Models and Their Individual Level Testing.
    Takemura K; Murakami H
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():778. PubMed ID: 27303338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Probability judgement in medicine: discounting unspecified possibilities.
    Redelmeier DA; Koehler DJ; Liberman V; Tversky A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7564936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.